2019Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & StructuresRequires access

Experimental evaluation of fatigue behaviour of thin Al5456 welded joints

A.R. Shahani, Iman Shakeri

Open publisher page 15 citations

Abstract

Abstract Because of wide applications of welded structures in different industries, using design codes and standards such as IIW recommendations is known as a safe and common method to design welded joints. The weld geometry and thickness of welded joint are the most important parameters that affect the fatigue strength of welded joints. In the present study, the fatigue behaviour of thin Al5456 butt‐welded joints has been investigated, and the effect of thickness on fatigue strength has been evaluated. Contrary to the above‐mentioned recommendations about thin welded joints, it was shown that the thickness of welded joints affects the fatigue strength. Moreover, the fatigue test results have been compared with the IIW design recommendations for three well‐known approaches in order to analyse the reliability of the codes. According to the design stress‐life diagrams, it was found that in some cases, the fatigue strength has much larger values than the IIW predictions, and IIW‐based design causes an over conservative design. While in some other cases, the fatigue strength is lower than IIW recommendations, and it leads to a non‐conservative design. Based on the experimental results, the new values for slope of S‐N curve and FAT have been proposed in order to improve the design diagrams.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Because of wide applications of welded structures in different industries, using design codes and standards such as IIW recommendations is known as a safe and common method to design welded joints. The weld geometry and thickness of welded joint are the most important parameters that affect the fatigue strength of welded joints. In the present study, the fatigue behaviour of thin Al5456 butt‐welded joints has been investigated, and the effect of thickness on fatigue strength has been evaluated. Contrary to the above‐mentioned recommendations about thin welded joints, it was shown that the thickness of welded joints affects the fatigue strength. Moreover, the fatigue test results have been compared with the IIW design recommendations for three well‐known approaches in order to analyse the reliability of the codes. According to the design stress‐life diagrams, it was found that in some cases, the fatigue strength has much larger values than the IIW predictions, and IIW‐based design causes an over conservative design. While in some other cases, the fatigue strength is lower than IIW recommendations, and it leads to a non‐conservative design. Based on the experimental results, the new values for slope of S‐N curve and FAT have been proposed in order to improve the design diagrams.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Because of wide applications of welded structures in different industries, using design codes and standards such as IIW recommendations is known as a safe and common method to design welded joints. The weld geometry and thickness of welded joint are the most important parameters that affect the fatigue strength of welded joints. In the present study, the fatigue behaviour of thin Al5456 butt‐welded joints has been investigated, and the effect of thickness on fatigue strength has been evaluated. Contrary to the above‐mentioned recommendations about thin welded joints, it was shown that the thickness of welded joints affects the fatigue strength. Moreover, the fatigue test results have been compared with the IIW design recommendations for three well‐known approaches in order to analyse the reliability of the codes. According to the design stress‐life diagrams, it was found that in some cases, the fatigue strength has much larger values than the IIW predictions, and IIW‐based design causes an over conservative design. While in some other cases, the fatigue strength is lower than IIW recommendations, and it leads to a non‐conservative design. Based on the experimental results, the new values for slope of S‐N curve and FAT have been proposed in order to improve the design diagrams.

Key concepts: Welding, Fatigue limit, Structural engineering, Joint (building), Butt joint, Reliability (semiconductor), Engineering, Materials science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Experimental evaluation of fatigue behaviour of thin Al5456 welded joints — Research Paper | ScholarLens