2019•Learning Disabilities Research and PracticeRequires access

Evidence‐Based Reviews: How Evidence‐Based Practices are Systematically Identified

Bryan G. Cook, Lauren W. Collins, Sara Cothren Cook, Lysandra Cook

Open publisher page 44 citations

Abstract

Abstract Evidence‐based reviews are a type of systematic literature review used to identify evidence‐based practices. When conducting an evidence‐based review, researchers apply predetermined standards to identify evidence‐based practices—practices that have been shown to reliably improve an outcome for a population of learners, according to evidence from a body of rigorous, experimental studies. In this article, we describe evidence‐based reviews, provide an overview of one set of evidence standards used in special education, and describe important caveats and considerations related to evidence‐based reviews. We conclude with two examples of evidence‐based reviews in the field of learning disabilities. Our take‐home message is that evidence‐based reviews are a trustworthy approach for identifying generally effective instructional practices—but no practices, not even evidence‐based practices, are effective for all learners.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Evidence‐based reviews are a type of systematic literature review used to identify evidence‐based practices. When conducting an evidence‐based review, researchers apply predetermined standards to identify evidence‐based practices—practices that have been shown to reliably improve an outcome for a population of learners, according to evidence from a body of rigorous, experimental studies. In this article, we describe evidence‐based reviews, provide an overview of one set of evidence standards used in special education, and describe important caveats and considerations related to evidence‐based reviews. We conclude with two examples of evidence‐based reviews in the field of learning disabilities. Our take‐home message is that evidence‐based reviews are a trustworthy approach for identifying generally effective instructional practices—but no practices, not even evidence‐based practices, are effective for all learners.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 44 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Evidence‐based reviews are a type of systematic literature review used to identify evidence‐based practices. When conducting an evidence‐based review, researchers apply predetermined standards to identify evidence‐based practices—practices that have been shown to reliably improve an outcome for a population of learners, according to evidence from a body of rigorous, experimental studies. In this article, we describe evidence‐based reviews, provide an overview of one set of evidence standards used in special education, and describe important caveats and considerations related to evidence‐based reviews. We conclude with two examples of evidence‐based reviews in the field of learning disabilities. Our take‐home message is that evidence‐based reviews are a trustworthy approach for identifying generally effective instructional practices—but no practices, not even evidence‐based practices, are effective for all learners.

Key concepts: Evidence-based practice, Best evidence, Systematic review, Psychology, Set (abstract data type), Best practice, Evidence-based medicine, Field (mathematics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evidence‐Based Reviews: How Evidence‐Based Practices are Systematically Identified — Research Paper | ScholarLens