ScholarLens Back to search
2019•Critical Care MedicineRequires access

1015: C-MAC VIDEOLARYNGOSCOPY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL DIRECT LARYNGOSCOPY FOR ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION

Byeong Chul Min

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Critical Care Medicine: January 2020 - Volume 48 - Issue 1 - p 487 doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000642996.45990.be

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Critical Care Medicine: January 2020 - Volume 48 - Issue 1 - p 487 doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000642996.45990.be

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Critical Care Medicine: January 2020 - Volume 48 - Issue 1 - p 487 doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000642996.45990.be

Key concepts: Medicine, Laryngoscopy, Endotracheal intubation, Anesthesia, Intubation

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
1015: C-MAC VIDEOLARYNGOSCOPY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL DIRECT LARYNGOSCOPY FOR ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION — Research Paper | ScholarLens