2019Unpublished venueRequires access

Social Integration and Political Protest

Karl‐Dieter Opp, Peter Hartmann, Petra Hartmann

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The proposition that integration into social life may be an important determinant of political participation will not be debated by any political scientist or sociologist. Major theoretical traditions, however, differ with respect to the kind of effect that social integration is assumed to have. This chapter proposes a model in which the variables we use to explain the relationship between integration and participation are specified precisely. The explanatory variables are taken from our rational choice theory of political protest. The chapter presents data in order to test to what extent the explanatory variables of the model are able to explain relationships between several types of integration on the one hand and participation on the other. The general model reveals that rational choice theory does not yield a simple prediction about the relationship between integration and participation. Many social science traditions have noted that integration into groups is connected with various costs and benefits.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The proposition that integration into social life may be an important determinant of political participation will not be debated by any political scientist or sociologist. Major theoretical traditions, however, differ with respect to the kind of effect that social integration is assumed to have. This chapter proposes a model in which the variables we use to explain the relationship between integration and participation are specified precisely. The explanatory variables are taken from our rational choice theory of political protest. The chapter presents data in order to test to what extent the explanatory variables of the model are able to explain relationships between several types of integration on the one hand and participation on the other. The general model reveals that rational choice theory does not yield a simple prediction about the relationship between integration and participation. Many social science traditions have noted that integration into groups is connected with various costs and benefits.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The proposition that integration into social life may be an important determinant of political participation will not be debated by any political scientist or sociologist. Major theoretical traditions, however, differ with respect to the kind of effect that social integration is assumed to have. This chapter proposes a model in which the variables we use to explain the relationship between integration and participation are specified precisely. The explanatory variables are taken from our rational choice theory of political protest. The chapter presents data in order to test to what extent the explanatory variables of the model are able to explain relationships between several types of integration on the one hand and participation on the other. The general model reveals that rational choice theory does not yield a simple prediction about the relationship between integration and participation. Many social science traditions have noted that integration into groups is connected with various costs and benefits.

Key concepts: Politics, Political science, Political economy, Sociology, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Social Integration and Political Protest — Research Paper | ScholarLens