2019Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Open access

Statistical Approaches to Crash Frequency Modelling: An overview of Poisson and Negative Binomial Models

Ahmed T.T

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

This paper provides an insight and comparison of the Poisson model and Poisson-Gamma model (also known as the Negative Binomial Model), the two most popular methodological approaches for crash frequency study. Despite the acceptance of Poisson model as one of the preliminary models, the model fails to understand over- and under-dispersed data and tends to produce biased result for small samples. The problem of the over-dispersed data is resolved in the Negative Binomial model. However, the model is unable to handle the data when it is under-dispersed and characterised by low sample-mean values and small sample sizes. A zero-inflated model has been introduced for both the Poisson and Negative Binomial model, to address the excess zero density. The zero inflated model is found to accommodate the significant number of zeros of a traditional count structure, which helps to model crash-free versus crash-prone zone of a roadway segment.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper provides an insight and comparison of the Poisson model and Poisson-Gamma model (also known as the Negative Binomial Model), the two most popular methodological approaches for crash frequency study. Despite the acceptance of Poisson model as one of the preliminary models, the model fails to understand over- and under-dispersed data and tends to produce biased result for small samples. The problem of the over-dispersed data is resolved in the Negative Binomial model. However, the model is unable to handle the data when it is under-dispersed and characterised by low sample-mean values and small sample sizes. A zero-inflated model has been introduced for both the Poisson and Negative Binomial model, to address the excess zero density. The zero inflated model is found to accommodate the significant number of zeros of a traditional count structure, which helps to model crash-free versus crash-prone zone of a roadway segment.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper provides an insight and comparison of the Poisson model and Poisson-Gamma model (also known as the Negative Binomial Model), the two most popular methodological approaches for crash frequency study. Despite the acceptance of Poisson model as one of the preliminary models, the model fails to understand over- and under-dispersed data and tends to produce biased result for small samples. The problem of the over-dispersed data is resolved in the Negative Binomial model. However, the model is unable to handle the data when it is under-dispersed and characterised by low sample-mean values and small sample sizes. A zero-inflated model has been introduced for both the Poisson and Negative Binomial model, to address the excess zero density. The zero inflated model is found to accommodate the significant number of zeros of a traditional count structure, which helps to model crash-free versus crash-prone zone of a roadway segment.

Key concepts: Negative binomial distribution, Poisson distribution, Count data, Crash, Quasi-likelihood, Zero-inflated model, Statistics, Statistical model

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Statistical Approaches to Crash Frequency Modelling: An overview of Poisson and Negative Binomial Models — Research Paper | ScholarLens