2019Wildfowl (Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust)Open access

Spring migration stopovers of swans Cygnus sp. in the Russian part of the Gulf of Finland

Elmira Zaynagutdinova, Sergey Kouzov, Polina R. Batova, Yuriy M. Mikhailov, Anna V. Kravchuk

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

During spring migration each year swans were counted every 5 days at two of the most important stopover sites for these species in the eastern part of the Gulf of Finland near St Petersburg, Russia.Swans were counted on the Kurgalsky Peninsula in 2005-2017 and on the northern coast of the Neva Bay in 2009-2017.The maximum number of swans recorded on the Kurgalsky Peninsula each year during the study varied widely, with Bewick's Swan Cygnus columbianus bewickii numbers ranging from 43-1,310 individuals and Whooper Swans C. cygnus varying from 35-747 individuals, whilst Mute Swan C. olor counts ranged from 68-394 individuals.The seasonal maximum number of swans on the northern coast of the Neva Bay in 2009-2018 also varied markedly, as Bewick's Swan counts varied from 35-460 birds and Whooper Swan counts ranged from 5-65 individuals, whilst the number of Mute Swans did not exceed seven individuals.In 2018, counts were carried out at almost all known stopover sites for migratory swans along the coast of the Gulf of Finland.Most were used by swans in 2018, but swan abundance was low compared to the published data from previous decades, with maximum species-specific counts in 2018 of 68 Mute Swans, 86 Whooper Swans and 103 Bewick's Swans.On comparing our data with previous studies, we consider that the number of swans in the Russian part of the Gulf of Finland has decreased since the 20th century, with the large stopovers of ≥ 1,000 swans having largely disappeared.The most likely cause of the decline in numbers, recorded both for Bewick's Swans and for Whooper Swans, is the industrial development of the region.Construction work on the coast in the areas adjacent to the swan migration sites can have a negative impact on birds, primarily due to the reclamation of the wetland habitat and increased water turbidity.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

During spring migration each year swans were counted every 5 days at two of the most important stopover sites for these species in the eastern part of the Gulf of Finland near St Petersburg, Russia.Swans were counted on the Kurgalsky Peninsula in 2005-2017 and on the northern coast of the Neva Bay in 2009-2017.The maximum number of swans recorded on the Kurgalsky Peninsula each year during the study varied widely, with Bewick's Swan Cygnus columbianus bewickii numbers ranging from 43-1,310 individuals and Whooper Swans C. cygnus varying from 35-747 individuals, whilst Mute Swan C. olor counts ranged from 68-394 individuals.The seasonal maximum number of swans on the northern coast of the Neva Bay in 2009-2018 also varied markedly, as Bewick's Swan counts varied from 35-460 birds and Whooper Swan counts ranged from 5-65 individuals, whilst the number of Mute Swans did not exceed seven individuals.In 2018, counts were carried out at almost all known stopover sites for migratory swans along the coast of the Gulf of Finland.Most were used by swans in 2018, but swan abundance was low compared to the published data from previous decades, with maximum species-specific counts in 2018 of 68 Mute Swans, 86 Whooper Swans and 103 Bewick's Swans.On comparing our data with previous studies, we consider that the number of swans in the Russian part of the Gulf of Finland has decreased since the 20th century, with the large stopovers of ≥ 1,000 swans having largely disappeared.The most likely cause of the decline in numbers, recorded both for Bewick's Swans and for Whooper Swans, is the industrial development of the region.Construction work on the coast in the areas adjacent to the swan migration sites can have a negative impact on birds, primarily due to the reclamation of the wetland habitat and increased water turbidity.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

During spring migration each year swans were counted every 5 days at two of the most important stopover sites for these species in the eastern part of the Gulf of Finland near St Petersburg, Russia.Swans were counted on the Kurgalsky Peninsula in 2005-2017 and on the northern coast of the Neva Bay in 2009-2017.The maximum number of swans recorded on the Kurgalsky Peninsula each year during the study varied widely, with Bewick's Swan Cygnus columbianus bewickii numbers ranging from 43-1,310 individuals and Whooper Swans C. cygnus varying from 35-747 individuals, whilst Mute Swan C. olor counts ranged from 68-394 individuals.The seasonal maximum number of swans on the northern coast of the Neva Bay in 2009-2018 also varied markedly, as Bewick's Swan counts varied from 35-460 birds and Whooper Swan counts ranged from 5-65 individuals, whilst the number of Mute Swans did not exceed seven individuals.In 2018, counts were carried out at almost all known stopover sites for migratory swans along the coast of the Gulf of Finland.Most were used by swans in 2018, but swan abundance was low compared to the published data from previous decades, with maximum species-specific counts in 2018 of 68 Mute Swans, 86 Whooper Swans and 103 Bewick's Swans.On comparing our data with previous studies, we consider that the number of swans in the Russian part of the Gulf of Finland has decreased since the 20th century, with the large stopovers of ≥ 1,000 swans having largely disappeared.The most likely cause of the decline in numbers, recorded both for Bewick's Swans and for Whooper Swans, is the industrial development of the region.Construction work on the coast in the areas adjacent to the swan migration sites can have a negative impact on birds, primarily due to the reclamation of the wetland habitat and increased water turbidity.

Key concepts: Peninsula, Black swan theory, Bay, Geography, Spring (device), Balkan peninsula, Fishery, Ecology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Spring migration stopovers of swans Cygnus sp. in the Russian part of the Gulf of Finland — Research Paper | ScholarLens