Recent Evolution of Large-Value Payment Systems: Balancing Liquidity and Risk
Antoine Martin
Abstract
Open-access reader
Antoine Martin
Abstract
Open-access reader
Large-value payment systems have evolved rapidly in the last 20years, continually striking a balance between providing liquidityand keeping settlement risk under control. Changes to the design or to the risk management policies of such systems were needed, in part, due to the growth in the value of transactions on these systems. For example, in the United States the value of transactions on Fedwire, the Federal Reserve’s large-value payment system, increased from about 50 times GDP in 1989 to over 62 times GDP in 2003. This value exceeded $704 trillion in 2003. This growth raised concerns that the settlement failure of a large institution could pose severe economic consequences. The disruption in settlements after September 11, 2001, brought new focus to questions such as: How reliable are the payment systems? How should liquidity be provided to system participants? And how can central banks protect themselves from excessive risk? This article considers the evolution of large-value payment systems in light of the trade-off between providing liquidity and limiting settlement risk. The main changes worldwide in the last 20 years reflect
OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Large-value payment systems have evolved rapidly in the last 20years, continually striking a balance between providing liquidityand keeping settlement risk under control. Changes to the design or to the risk management policies of such systems were needed, in part, due to the growth in the value of transactions on these systems. For example, in the United States the value of transactions on Fedwire, the Federal Reserve’s large-value payment system, increased from about 50 times GDP in 1989 to over 62 times GDP in 2003. This value exceeded $704 trillion in 2003. This growth raised concerns that the settlement failure of a large institution could pose severe economic consequences. The disruption in settlements after September 11, 2001, brought new focus to questions such as: How reliable are the payment systems? How should liquidity be provided to system participants? And how can central banks protect themselves from excessive risk? This article considers the evolution of large-value payment systems in light of the trade-off between providing liquidity and limiting settlement risk. The main changes worldwide in the last 20 years reflect
Key concepts: Settlement (finance), Market liquidity, Payment system, Human settlement, Payment, Business, Value (mathematics), Liquidity risk