2005MycotaxonRequires access

The taxonomy of Echinochaete and Polyporus s. str. in southern South America. [Erratum: 2006 Apr-June, v. 96, p. 362.]

Rosa Mara Borges da Silveira, Jorge E. Wright

Open publisher page 20 citations

Abstract

Taxonomic characters of the genera Echinochaete and Polyporus s. str. from southern South America are summarized based on examination of 350 collections, including 88 holotypes from different herbaria. The research revealed one species of Echinochaete and nineteen species and one variety of Polyporus s. str. representing four established subgenera (Polyporus, Melanopus, Polyporellus, Favolus). and the new subgenus, Austropolyporus, proposed here to accommodate P. gayanus. Pseudofavolus is considered a synonym of Polyporus s. str. Polyporus arcularioides is accepted as a separate taxon. Polyporus brumalis was not found in the area studied. Polyporus saltensis, considered an autonomous taxon, differs from P. tenuiculus in lacking clamp connections. Polyporus tucumanensis is recognized as a separate species distinct from P. ciliatus. Polyporus maculatissimus, usually considered within Polyporus s. str., belongs in Neolentiporus.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Taxonomic characters of the genera Echinochaete and Polyporus s. str. from southern South America are summarized based on examination of 350 collections, including 88 holotypes from different herbaria. The research revealed one species of Echinochaete and nineteen species and one variety of Polyporus s. str. representing four established subgenera (Polyporus, Melanopus, Polyporellus, Favolus). and the new subgenus, Austropolyporus, proposed here to accommodate P. gayanus. Pseudofavolus is considered a synonym of Polyporus s. str. Polyporus arcularioides is accepted as a separate taxon. Polyporus brumalis was not found in the area studied. Polyporus saltensis, considered an autonomous taxon, differs from P. tenuiculus in lacking clamp connections. Polyporus tucumanensis is recognized as a separate species distinct from P. ciliatus. Polyporus maculatissimus, usually considered within Polyporus s. str., belongs in Neolentiporus.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Taxonomic characters of the genera Echinochaete and Polyporus s. str. from southern South America are summarized based on examination of 350 collections, including 88 holotypes from different herbaria. The research revealed one species of Echinochaete and nineteen species and one variety of Polyporus s. str. representing four established subgenera (Polyporus, Melanopus, Polyporellus, Favolus). and the new subgenus, Austropolyporus, proposed here to accommodate P. gayanus. Pseudofavolus is considered a synonym of Polyporus s. str. Polyporus arcularioides is accepted as a separate taxon. Polyporus brumalis was not found in the area studied. Polyporus saltensis, considered an autonomous taxon, differs from P. tenuiculus in lacking clamp connections. Polyporus tucumanensis is recognized as a separate species distinct from P. ciliatus. Polyporus maculatissimus, usually considered within Polyporus s. str., belongs in Neolentiporus.

Key concepts: Polyporus, Subgenus, Taxon, Herbarium, Taxonomy (biology), Biology, Zoology, Synonym (taxonomy)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The taxonomy of Echinochaete and Polyporus s. str. in southern South America. [Erratum: 2006 Apr-June, v. 96, p. 362.] — Research Paper | ScholarLens