2007PubMedRequires access

[Difficulties and mistakes in the diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia].

N M Kxmel'nitskaia, E.L. Neishtadt, Z K Khalimdzhanov

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

687 endometrial biopsy specimens with morphological diagnosis "atypical endometrial hyperplasia" were examined by pathologists from the city cancer. The specimens were obtained from 32 hospitals of Saint Petersburg. They revealed atypical endometrial hyperplasia in 47 (6.8%) cases, endometrial adenocarcinoma in 54 (7.9%), typical hyperplasia in 211 (30.7%), polyp in 165 (24%), proliferative endometrium in 89 (13.0%), secretory endometrium in 80 (11.7%), and atrophic endometrium in 10 (1.4%). Thirty-one (4.5%) biopsy specimens failed to provide evidence. Also biopsy and surgery specimens (n = 78) were compared. Hysterectomy was performed in atypical endometrial hyperplasia. Comparison of the diagnoses revealed atypical endometrial hyperplasia in 14 (17.9%) cases, endometrial adenocarcinoma in 41 (52.7%), typical endometrial hyperplasia in 21 (26.9%), and polyp in 2 (2.5%).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

687 endometrial biopsy specimens with morphological diagnosis "atypical endometrial hyperplasia" were examined by pathologists from the city cancer. The specimens were obtained from 32 hospitals of Saint Petersburg. They revealed atypical endometrial hyperplasia in 47 (6.8%) cases, endometrial adenocarcinoma in 54 (7.9%), typical hyperplasia in 211 (30.7%), polyp in 165 (24%), proliferative endometrium in 89 (13.0%), secretory endometrium in 80 (11.7%), and atrophic endometrium in 10 (1.4%). Thirty-one (4.5%) biopsy specimens failed to provide evidence. Also biopsy and surgery specimens (n = 78) were compared. Hysterectomy was performed in atypical endometrial hyperplasia. Comparison of the diagnoses revealed atypical endometrial hyperplasia in 14 (17.9%) cases, endometrial adenocarcinoma in 41 (52.7%), typical endometrial hyperplasia in 21 (26.9%), and polyp in 2 (2.5%).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

687 endometrial biopsy specimens with morphological diagnosis "atypical endometrial hyperplasia" were examined by pathologists from the city cancer. The specimens were obtained from 32 hospitals of Saint Petersburg. They revealed atypical endometrial hyperplasia in 47 (6.8%) cases, endometrial adenocarcinoma in 54 (7.9%), typical hyperplasia in 211 (30.7%), polyp in 165 (24%), proliferative endometrium in 89 (13.0%), secretory endometrium in 80 (11.7%), and atrophic endometrium in 10 (1.4%). Thirty-one (4.5%) biopsy specimens failed to provide evidence. Also biopsy and surgery specimens (n = 78) were compared. Hysterectomy was performed in atypical endometrial hyperplasia. Comparison of the diagnoses revealed atypical endometrial hyperplasia in 14 (17.9%) cases, endometrial adenocarcinoma in 41 (52.7%), typical endometrial hyperplasia in 21 (26.9%), and polyp in 2 (2.5%).

Key concepts: Endometrial hyperplasia, Hyperplasia, Endometrium, Medicine, Endometrial biopsy, Endometrial cancer, Biopsy, Hysterectomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Difficulties and mistakes in the diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens