The effect of coplanar sensor spacing on determining the angular acceleration of vehicles
Gregory Joseph Cocchiola, Amin Joodaky, Grégory Batt, James M. Gibert
Abstract
Gregory Joseph Cocchiola, Amin Joodaky, Grégory Batt, James M. Gibert
Abstract
Vehicle vibration presents challenges to a packaged product that is inevitable in any distribution environment. Typically products are tested in only a single, vertical axis; researchers have shown that there is energy in all six axes of motion. In this work, we study the recording methods of the six degrees of freedom (6DOF) motion of a transport vehicle. Using a co‐planar sensor array, three tri‐axial linear accelerometers and three angular rate sensors mounted in a L shape are used to calculate the rotational accelerations that occur in the back of a vehicle. Missing from prior work is a scientific study designed to determine the minimum sensor spacing necessary to accurately capture the yaw, pitch, and roll of transport vehicles. A sensitivity study is conducted to determine the effect of the misplacement and misorientation of sensors on the angular acceleration calculation. A laboratory study is used to determine the distance error begins to accumulate in the angular acceleration calculation in response to a sinusoidal input. A field study is conducted to calculate the rotational motions of a vehicle on a rough road. It is found that a mounting fixture is valuable in assuring the necessary sensor placement accuracy needed to accurately determine angular accelerations of a truck. Additionally, laboratory and field analysis show that as the sensor spacing location approaches the origin sensor, angular acceleration calculation error increases due to a loss in distinctiveness. It is desired for a close sensor mounting array, but there is a trade off between measurement accuracy and compactness of the recording array. A limit exists where the sensors can not be mounted in close proximity.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Vehicle vibration presents challenges to a packaged product that is inevitable in any distribution environment. Typically products are tested in only a single, vertical axis; researchers have shown that there is energy in all six axes of motion. In this work, we study the recording methods of the six degrees of freedom (6DOF) motion of a transport vehicle. Using a co‐planar sensor array, three tri‐axial linear accelerometers and three angular rate sensors mounted in a L shape are used to calculate the rotational accelerations that occur in the back of a vehicle. Missing from prior work is a scientific study designed to determine the minimum sensor spacing necessary to accurately capture the yaw, pitch, and roll of transport vehicles. A sensitivity study is conducted to determine the effect of the misplacement and misorientation of sensors on the angular acceleration calculation. A laboratory study is used to determine the distance error begins to accumulate in the angular acceleration calculation in response to a sinusoidal input. A field study is conducted to calculate the rotational motions of a vehicle on a rough road. It is found that a mounting fixture is valuable in assuring the necessary sensor placement accuracy needed to accurately determine angular accelerations of a truck. Additionally, laboratory and field analysis show that as the sensor spacing location approaches the origin sensor, angular acceleration calculation error increases due to a loss in distinctiveness. It is desired for a close sensor mounting array, but there is a trade off between measurement accuracy and compactness of the recording array. A limit exists where the sensors can not be mounted in close proximity.
Key concepts: Angular acceleration, Acceleration, Accelerometer, Angular velocity, Acoustics, Sensitivity (control systems), Jerk, Angular displacement