2006Journal of global business and technologyRequires access

Scale, R&d Performance and Idea Profiles for New Products: A Comparative Study of U.S. and German Manufacturing Firms

John E. Ettlie, Jörg M. Elsenbach

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The literature remains inconsistent in theory and findings on research inputs: small, medium or large firms are more efficient in their use of scarce technical resources depending upon your view and data. Further complicating this debate is the notion of diminishing returns to scale on RD they can exploit capital markets better than smaller firms; as well as economies of scale and scope in the actual conduct of research (Henderson and Cockburn, 1996, p. 33). They support their argument on scale economies and knowledge spillovers with data from 10 pharmaceutical firms. Neither view takes into account small and large firm partnerships which could enhance RD Tsai, 2005). Further, industry differences can significantly moderate this effect (Audretsch, 2001,2002). Perhaps what is least well understood about the efficiency argument is the way in which this actually operates to produce innovative outcomes. …

About this research paper

What this paper is about

ABSTRACT The literature remains inconsistent in theory and findings on research inputs: small, medium or large firms are more efficient in their use of scarce technical resources depending upon your view and data. Further complicating this debate is the notion of diminishing returns to scale on RD they can exploit capital markets better than smaller firms; as well as economies of scale and scope in the actual conduct of research (Henderson and Cockburn, 1996, p. 33). They support their argument on scale economies and knowledge spillovers with data from 10 pharmaceutical firms. Neither view takes into account small and large firm partnerships which could enhance RD Tsai, 2005). Further, industry differences can significantly moderate this effect (Audretsch, 2001,2002). Perhaps what is least well understood about the efficiency argument is the way in which this actually operates to produce innovative outcomes. …

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

ABSTRACT The literature remains inconsistent in theory and findings on research inputs: small, medium or large firms are more efficient in their use of scarce technical resources depending upon your view and data. Further complicating this debate is the notion of diminishing returns to scale on RD they can exploit capital markets better than smaller firms; as well as economies of scale and scope in the actual conduct of research (Henderson and Cockburn, 1996, p. 33). They support their argument on scale economies and knowledge spillovers with data from 10 pharmaceutical firms. Neither view takes into account small and large firm partnerships which could enhance RD Tsai, 2005). Further, industry differences can significantly moderate this effect (Audretsch, 2001,2002). Perhaps what is least well understood about the efficiency argument is the way in which this actually operates to produce innovative outcomes. …

Key concepts: Economies of scope, Argument (complex analysis), Economies of scale, Exploit, Scale (ratio), German, Industrial organization, Scope (computer science)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Scale, R&d Performance and Idea Profiles for New Products: A Comparative Study of U.S. and German Manufacturing Firms — Research Paper | ScholarLens