2018•PubMedRequires access

[Evaluation of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Patients with Hematological Malignancies Using MASCC Antiemesis Tool(MAT)].

Kana Oiwa, Naoko Hosono, Kazuhiro Itoh, Miyuki Ookura, Yasufumi Matsuda, Katsunori Tai, Takanori Ueda, Takahiro Yamauchi

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting(CINV)were prospectively evaluated using MASCC Antiemesis Tool(MAT) in patients with hematological malignancies in our institution. A total of 33 patients receiving 46 chemotherapy courses were evaluated. Although vomiting was not observed in the acute phase, nausea was seen in 22.6% and 32.3% of the patients in the acute and delayed phases, respectively. Thirty percent(25 cases)of the patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy presented nausea in both the phases, while 40%(18 cases)of the patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy presented nausea in the delayed phase. The oral intake was quantitated retrospectively in 31 patients with non- Hodgkin's lymphoma, who were hospitalized and received CHOP±R. Prior to the initiation of the chemotherapy, 13 patients received the first generation 5-HT3 receptor antagonist granisetron, while 18 patients received the second generation palonosetron. Oral intake was greater in the patients who were administered palonosetron. Thus, the present study suggested that antiemetic treatment could be improved at our institution.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting(CINV)were prospectively evaluated using MASCC Antiemesis Tool(MAT) in patients with hematological malignancies in our institution. A total of 33 patients receiving 46 chemotherapy courses were evaluated. Although vomiting was not observed in the acute phase, nausea was seen in 22.6% and 32.3% of the patients in the acute and delayed phases, respectively. Thirty percent(25 cases)of the patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy presented nausea in both the phases, while 40%(18 cases)of the patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy presented nausea in the delayed phase. The oral intake was quantitated retrospectively in 31 patients with non- Hodgkin's lymphoma, who were hospitalized and received CHOP±R. Prior to the initiation of the chemotherapy, 13 patients received the first generation 5-HT3 receptor antagonist granisetron, while 18 patients received the second generation palonosetron. Oral intake was greater in the patients who were administered palonosetron. Thus, the present study suggested that antiemetic treatment could be improved at our institution.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting(CINV)were prospectively evaluated using MASCC Antiemesis Tool(MAT) in patients with hematological malignancies in our institution. A total of 33 patients receiving 46 chemotherapy courses were evaluated. Although vomiting was not observed in the acute phase, nausea was seen in 22.6% and 32.3% of the patients in the acute and delayed phases, respectively. Thirty percent(25 cases)of the patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy presented nausea in both the phases, while 40%(18 cases)of the patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy presented nausea in the delayed phase. The oral intake was quantitated retrospectively in 31 patients with non- Hodgkin's lymphoma, who were hospitalized and received CHOP±R. Prior to the initiation of the chemotherapy, 13 patients received the first generation 5-HT3 receptor antagonist granisetron, while 18 patients received the second generation palonosetron. Oral intake was greater in the patients who were administered palonosetron. Thus, the present study suggested that antiemetic treatment could be improved at our institution.

Key concepts: Nausea, Palonosetron, Granisetron, Vomiting, Medicine, Antiemetic, Chemotherapy, Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Evaluation of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Patients with Hematological Malignancies Using MASCC Antiemesis Tool(MAT)]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens