2019Molecular SimulationRequires access

The effect of many-body potential type and parameterisation on the accuracy of predicting mechanical properties of aluminium using molecular dynamics

Sabir Subedi, Liam S. Morrissey, Stephen M. Handrigan, Sam Nakhla

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

As opposed to traditional laboratory testing, Molecular Dynamics (MD) offers an atomistic scale method to estimate the mechanical properties of metals. However, there is limited literature that shows the effect of interatomic potentials when determining mechanical properties. Hence, the present research was conducted to investigate the accuracy of various interatomic potentials in estimating mechanical properties of aluminium. Several types of potentials, including Embedded Atom Method (EAM), Modified EAM (MEAM) and Reactive Force Field (ReaxFF) were compared with available experimental data for pure aluminium to determine the most accurate interatomic potential. A uniaxial tensile test was performed at room temperature using MD simulations for nanoscale aluminium. Results demonstrated that those potentials parameterised with elastic constants at physically realisable temperatures were consistently more accurate. Overall, the Mishin et al. EAM potential was the most accurate when compared to single-crystal experimental values. Regardless of the potential type, the error was significantly higher for those potentials that did not consider elastic constants during development. In brief, the application of the interatomic potentials to estimate mechanical properties of a nanoscale aluminium was investigated.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

As opposed to traditional laboratory testing, Molecular Dynamics (MD) offers an atomistic scale method to estimate the mechanical properties of metals. However, there is limited literature that shows the effect of interatomic potentials when determining mechanical properties. Hence, the present research was conducted to investigate the accuracy of various interatomic potentials in estimating mechanical properties of aluminium. Several types of potentials, including Embedded Atom Method (EAM), Modified EAM (MEAM) and Reactive Force Field (ReaxFF) were compared with available experimental data for pure aluminium to determine the most accurate interatomic potential. A uniaxial tensile test was performed at room temperature using MD simulations for nanoscale aluminium. Results demonstrated that those potentials parameterised with elastic constants at physically realisable temperatures were consistently more accurate. Overall, the Mishin et al. EAM potential was the most accurate when compared to single-crystal experimental values. Regardless of the potential type, the error was significantly higher for those potentials that did not consider elastic constants during development. In brief, the application of the interatomic potentials to estimate mechanical properties of a nanoscale aluminium was investigated.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

As opposed to traditional laboratory testing, Molecular Dynamics (MD) offers an atomistic scale method to estimate the mechanical properties of metals. However, there is limited literature that shows the effect of interatomic potentials when determining mechanical properties. Hence, the present research was conducted to investigate the accuracy of various interatomic potentials in estimating mechanical properties of aluminium. Several types of potentials, including Embedded Atom Method (EAM), Modified EAM (MEAM) and Reactive Force Field (ReaxFF) were compared with available experimental data for pure aluminium to determine the most accurate interatomic potential. A uniaxial tensile test was performed at room temperature using MD simulations for nanoscale aluminium. Results demonstrated that those potentials parameterised with elastic constants at physically realisable temperatures were consistently more accurate. Overall, the Mishin et al. EAM potential was the most accurate when compared to single-crystal experimental values. Regardless of the potential type, the error was significantly higher for those potentials that did not consider elastic constants during development. In brief, the application of the interatomic potentials to estimate mechanical properties of a nanoscale aluminium was investigated.

Key concepts: Embedded atom model, ReaxFF, Interatomic potential, Molecular dynamics, Aluminium, Force field (fiction), Materials science, Atom (system on chip)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The effect of many-body potential type and parameterisation on the accuracy of predicting mechanical properties of aluminium using molecular dynamics — Research Paper | ScholarLens