Early Predictors of Left Ventricular Remodeling after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
M.Sc. MAHMOUD EL-SABOUR MOHAMED KASEM ALI, HAMDY SHAMS-EDDIN; AMR A.A. YOUSSEF, M.D.
Abstract
Open-access reader
M.Sc. MAHMOUD EL-SABOUR MOHAMED KASEM ALI, HAMDY SHAMS-EDDIN; AMR A.A. YOUSSEF, M.D.
Abstract
Open-access reader
Background: Successful primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI), has reduced the mortality of patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI). However, the increased survival rate resulted in the increased incidence of Left Ventricular (LV) remodeling. Ventricular remodeling is a predictor of heart failure and for this reason it assumes a negative prognostic value.Aim of the Study: Was to assess the percentage of LV remodeling and to identify at discharge early predictors of LV remodeling after primary PCI.Material and Methods: We included 152 patients diag-nosed as acute STEMI and underwent successful primary PCI. All patients were examined by transthoracic echocardi-ography at discharge and 6 months later. LV remodeling defined as increase in Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume Index (LVEDVI) >20%. Patients were grouped into two groups: Group I (with LV remodeling) and Group II (without LV remodeling). The following factors affecting LV remodeling were evaluated: Infarct Related Artery (IRA), number of vessels affected, use of thrombus aspiration, type of stent used, post PCI TIMI flow, time to reperfusion, Wall Motion Score Index (WMSI) and cardiovascular risk factors.Results: Patients with an increase in LVEDVI >20% who were considered to have LV remodeling (Group I) were 49 patients (32.2%). Anterior MI was significantly more in GroupI patients (89.8%) vs. (44.7%) in Group II patients (p-value= 0.00). Left Anterior Descending (LAD) artery affection was significantly more in Group I (89.8%) vs. (45.6%) in GroupII (p-value=0.00). Ejection fraction noticed to be significantly greater at baseline in Group II (51±6.81%) vs. (41.4±6.59%) in Group I (p-value=0.00) while Group I patients had signif-icant higher WMSI (1.66±0.19) vs. (1.28±0.17) in Group II (p-value=0.00).Conclusions: LV remodeling occurred in 32.2% of patients. Patients with ECG diagnosis as (anterior MI), WMSI (>1.5), ejection fraction (£45%), and LAD as an IRA were at higher risk for LV remodeling (p<0.05). WMSI (>1.5) and LAD as an IRA were the only independent predictors for LV remodeling after primary PCI (relative risk; 3.2 and 2.6 respectively).
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Background: Successful primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI), has reduced the mortality of patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI). However, the increased survival rate resulted in the increased incidence of Left Ventricular (LV) remodeling. Ventricular remodeling is a predictor of heart failure and for this reason it assumes a negative prognostic value.Aim of the Study: Was to assess the percentage of LV remodeling and to identify at discharge early predictors of LV remodeling after primary PCI.Material and Methods: We included 152 patients diag-nosed as acute STEMI and underwent successful primary PCI. All patients were examined by transthoracic echocardi-ography at discharge and 6 months later. LV remodeling defined as increase in Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume Index (LVEDVI) >20%. Patients were grouped into two groups: Group I (with LV remodeling) and Group II (without LV remodeling). The following factors affecting LV remodeling were evaluated: Infarct Related Artery (IRA), number of vessels affected, use of thrombus aspiration, type of stent used, post PCI TIMI flow, time to reperfusion, Wall Motion Score Index (WMSI) and cardiovascular risk factors.Results: Patients with an increase in LVEDVI >20% who were considered to have LV remodeling (Group I) were 49 patients (32.2%). Anterior MI was significantly more in GroupI patients (89.8%) vs. (44.7%) in Group II patients (p-value= 0.00). Left Anterior Descending (LAD) artery affection was significantly more in Group I (89.8%) vs. (45.6%) in GroupII (p-value=0.00). Ejection fraction noticed to be significantly greater at baseline in Group II (51±6.81%) vs. (41.4±6.59%) in Group I (p-value=0.00) while Group I patients had signif-icant higher WMSI (1.66±0.19) vs. (1.28±0.17) in Group II (p-value=0.00).Conclusions: LV remodeling occurred in 32.2% of patients. Patients with ECG diagnosis as (anterior MI), WMSI (>1.5), ejection fraction (£45%), and LAD as an IRA were at higher risk for LV remodeling (p<0.05). WMSI (>1.5) and LAD as an IRA were the only independent predictors for LV remodeling after primary PCI (relative risk; 3.2 and 2.6 respectively).
Key concepts: Percutaneous coronary intervention, Cardiology, Ventricular remodeling, Internal medicine, Medicine, Myocardial infarction