2012•PubMedRequires access

Availability of troponin testing for cardiac patients in New Zealand 2002 to 2011: implications for patient care.

Mohammad Latif, Chris Ellis, Alexei Chataline, Greg D. Gamble, Cam Kyle, Harvey White

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

AIMS: For patients presenting with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS), troponin T or I levels are crucial for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI). We investigated troponin tests, analyser types and thresholds used in New Zealand (NZ) from 2002 to 2011. METHODS: We reviewed troponin tests available at hospitals in NZ which admitted ACS patients and those who had troponin testing in 2002 (n=41), 2007 (n=43) and 2011 (n=43). We also contacted community laboratories and manufacturers. RESULTS: In 2010-11 there were nine different troponin analysers in 43 hospitals provided by five companies. Troponin T assays were used in 58% of the hospitals and 42% used troponin I as their first-line method. Quoted cutpoints have become more aligned since 2002 and 2007, but are still different from laboratory cutpoints using point of care methods. CONCLUSIONS: There are differences in troponin tests available across NZ. Test thresholds and units vary, even for the same test, and available diagnostic information cannot always be used to identify a troponin rise and fall. Care is needed when comparing results from different methods and when point of care instruments are used. A coordinated national approach to the development of new biochemical tests, such as troponins, may result in better use of resources and better patient care.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIMS: For patients presenting with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS), troponin T or I levels are crucial for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI). We investigated troponin tests, analyser types and thresholds used in New Zealand (NZ) from 2002 to 2011. METHODS: We reviewed troponin tests available at hospitals in NZ which admitted ACS patients and those who had troponin testing in 2002 (n=41), 2007 (n=43) and 2011 (n=43). We also contacted community laboratories and manufacturers. RESULTS: In 2010-11 there were nine different troponin analysers in 43 hospitals provided by five companies. Troponin T assays were used in 58% of the hospitals and 42% used troponin I as their first-line method. Quoted cutpoints have become more aligned since 2002 and 2007, but are still different from laboratory cutpoints using point of care methods. CONCLUSIONS: There are differences in troponin tests available across NZ. Test thresholds and units vary, even for the same test, and available diagnostic information cannot always be used to identify a troponin rise and fall. Care is needed when comparing results from different methods and when point of care instruments are used. A coordinated national approach to the development of new biochemical tests, such as troponins, may result in better use of resources and better patient care.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIMS: For patients presenting with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS), troponin T or I levels are crucial for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI). We investigated troponin tests, analyser types and thresholds used in New Zealand (NZ) from 2002 to 2011. METHODS: We reviewed troponin tests available at hospitals in NZ which admitted ACS patients and those who had troponin testing in 2002 (n=41), 2007 (n=43) and 2011 (n=43). We also contacted community laboratories and manufacturers. RESULTS: In 2010-11 there were nine different troponin analysers in 43 hospitals provided by five companies. Troponin T assays were used in 58% of the hospitals and 42% used troponin I as their first-line method. Quoted cutpoints have become more aligned since 2002 and 2007, but are still different from laboratory cutpoints using point of care methods. CONCLUSIONS: There are differences in troponin tests available across NZ. Test thresholds and units vary, even for the same test, and available diagnostic information cannot always be used to identify a troponin rise and fall. Care is needed when comparing results from different methods and when point of care instruments are used. A coordinated national approach to the development of new biochemical tests, such as troponins, may result in better use of resources and better patient care.

Key concepts: Medicine, Troponin, Acute coronary syndrome, Myocardial infarction, Point-of-care testing, Point of care, Troponin I, Myocardial infarction diagnosis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Availability of troponin testing for cardiac patients in New Zealand 2002 to 2011: implications for patient care. — Research Paper | ScholarLens