2020•DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Requires access

Comparison of Changes in Mandibular Third Molar Angulation Following First/Second Premolar Extraction versus Non-Extraction Orthodontic Treatments

Soodeh Tahmasbi, Ladan Eslamian, Massoud Seifi, Mohammad-abbas Abdolsamadi, Shideh Eslamy Yamchi

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Objective: Extraction of premolars is believed to affect the eruption of third molars. This comparative study aimed to assess the change in angulation of third molars following first/second premolar extraction versus non-extraction orthodontic treatments. Methods: This historical cohort study was conducted on patients assigned to three treatment groups: extraction of mandibular first premolars (group A), extraction of mandibular second premolars (group B) and non-extraction orthodontic treatment (group C). Each group included 30 third molars. Patients were in the age range of 11-19 years and the third molars were in Nolla’s6-8 stage of tooth development. Pre- and post-treatment panoramic radiographs were analyzed. Results: The angle between the long axis of the mandibular third molar and mandibular plane increased by 7 (2.2°) in group A and 5.2° in group B and the increase in both groups was statistically significant (p<0.05). Angular changes in group C were not statistically significant (p>0.05). The angle between the long axes of mandibular first and third molars decreased by 6.83 (0.3°) in group A. This reduction was statistically significant (p<0.05). Conclusion: In extraction orthodontic treatments (versus non-extraction treatments), mandibular third molars tend to straighten up and become upright so the risk of their impaction may be decreased.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: Extraction of premolars is believed to affect the eruption of third molars. This comparative study aimed to assess the change in angulation of third molars following first/second premolar extraction versus non-extraction orthodontic treatments. Methods: This historical cohort study was conducted on patients assigned to three treatment groups: extraction of mandibular first premolars (group A), extraction of mandibular second premolars (group B) and non-extraction orthodontic treatment (group C). Each group included 30 third molars. Patients were in the age range of 11-19 years and the third molars were in Nolla’s6-8 stage of tooth development. Pre- and post-treatment panoramic radiographs were analyzed. Results: The angle between the long axis of the mandibular third molar and mandibular plane increased by 7 (2.2°) in group A and 5.2° in group B and the increase in both groups was statistically significant (p<0.05). Angular changes in group C were not statistically significant (p>0.05). The angle between the long axes of mandibular first and third molars decreased by 6.83 (0.3°) in group A. This reduction was statistically significant (p<0.05). Conclusion: In extraction orthodontic treatments (versus non-extraction treatments), mandibular third molars tend to straighten up and become upright so the risk of their impaction may be decreased.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: Extraction of premolars is believed to affect the eruption of third molars. This comparative study aimed to assess the change in angulation of third molars following first/second premolar extraction versus non-extraction orthodontic treatments. Methods: This historical cohort study was conducted on patients assigned to three treatment groups: extraction of mandibular first premolars (group A), extraction of mandibular second premolars (group B) and non-extraction orthodontic treatment (group C). Each group included 30 third molars. Patients were in the age range of 11-19 years and the third molars were in Nolla’s6-8 stage of tooth development. Pre- and post-treatment panoramic radiographs were analyzed. Results: The angle between the long axis of the mandibular third molar and mandibular plane increased by 7 (2.2°) in group A and 5.2° in group B and the increase in both groups was statistically significant (p<0.05). Angular changes in group C were not statistically significant (p>0.05). The angle between the long axes of mandibular first and third molars decreased by 6.83 (0.3°) in group A. This reduction was statistically significant (p<0.05). Conclusion: In extraction orthodontic treatments (versus non-extraction treatments), mandibular third molars tend to straighten up and become upright so the risk of their impaction may be decreased.

Key concepts: Molar, Medicine, Mandibular third molar, Impaction, Dentistry, Premolar, Mandibular second molar, Mandibular first molar

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Changes in Mandibular Third Molar Angulation Following First/Second Premolar Extraction versus Non-Extraction Orthodontic Treatments — Research Paper | ScholarLens