2015•KardiologiiaRequires access

The Use of Dabigatran for Prevention of Thromboembolic Complications in Patients Underwent Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation

Sergey E. Mamchur, Elena V. Gorbunova, D.A. Sherbinina Sherbinina, M. P. ROMANOVA

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The aim of the study was to estimate the efficacy and safety of dabigatran in comparison with warfarin after atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation (CA). METHODS: 228 consecutive patients, having undergone AF CA, were enrolled in retrospective trial. In group I (n=170) warfarin was administered by modified interrupted scheme, in group II (n=58) dabigatran was administered by 150 mg twice a day. The main clinical efficacy and safety indicators were evaluated during the procedure and within 12 months after the procedure. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between patients taking warfarin and dabigatran (p>0,1) in all of the investigated parameters, including the amount of bleeding and thromboembolic events. Side effects of mild dyspepsia were observed in the dabigatran group in 2.7% of the observations and in the warfarin group in 2.4% (p = 0,589). None of them required discontinuation of the therapy. CONCLUSION: Dabigatran can be considered as an alternative to warfarin for anticoagulation in patients undergoing AF CA.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

UNLABELLED: The aim of the study was to estimate the efficacy and safety of dabigatran in comparison with warfarin after atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation (CA). METHODS: 228 consecutive patients, having undergone AF CA, were enrolled in retrospective trial. In group I (n=170) warfarin was administered by modified interrupted scheme, in group II (n=58) dabigatran was administered by 150 mg twice a day. The main clinical efficacy and safety indicators were evaluated during the procedure and within 12 months after the procedure. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between patients taking warfarin and dabigatran (p>0,1) in all of the investigated parameters, including the amount of bleeding and thromboembolic events. Side effects of mild dyspepsia were observed in the dabigatran group in 2.7% of the observations and in the warfarin group in 2.4% (p = 0,589). None of them required discontinuation of the therapy. CONCLUSION: Dabigatran can be considered as an alternative to warfarin for anticoagulation in patients undergoing AF CA.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

UNLABELLED: The aim of the study was to estimate the efficacy and safety of dabigatran in comparison with warfarin after atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation (CA). METHODS: 228 consecutive patients, having undergone AF CA, were enrolled in retrospective trial. In group I (n=170) warfarin was administered by modified interrupted scheme, in group II (n=58) dabigatran was administered by 150 mg twice a day. The main clinical efficacy and safety indicators were evaluated during the procedure and within 12 months after the procedure. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between patients taking warfarin and dabigatran (p>0,1) in all of the investigated parameters, including the amount of bleeding and thromboembolic events. Side effects of mild dyspepsia were observed in the dabigatran group in 2.7% of the observations and in the warfarin group in 2.4% (p = 0,589). None of them required discontinuation of the therapy. CONCLUSION: Dabigatran can be considered as an alternative to warfarin for anticoagulation in patients undergoing AF CA.

Key concepts: Dabigatran, Medicine, Warfarin, Discontinuation, Atrial fibrillation, Catheter ablation, Anesthesia, Retrospective cohort study

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Use of Dabigatran for Prevention of Thromboembolic Complications in Patients Underwent Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation — Research Paper | ScholarLens