2018•PubMedRequires access

Cross-reactivity in serological tests for brucellosis: a comparison of immune response of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 vs Brucella spp.

Barbara Bonfini, Giuseppina Laura Chiarenza, Valentina Paci, Flavio Sacchini, Romolo Salini, Gesualdo Vesco, Sara Villari, Katiuscia Zilli, Manuela Tittarelli

Open publisher page 54 citations

Abstract

According to European Union (EU) regulations, the serological tests for the eradication of bovine and ovine brucellosis are the Rose Bengal Test, Complement Fixation Test, and i-ELISA. These methods, also recommended by the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) for international trades, have limitations related to the use of suspensions of smooth Brucellae or LPS extracts. Limitations include false-positive serological reactions to brucellosis, which in turn impedes accurate diagnosis in some herds. False positive reactions should be considered carefully during the final stages of an eradication programme and for surveillance purposes in brucellosis-free areas. In this study, we produced specific sera through the experimental infection of sheep with Y. enterocolitica O:9 and E. coli O157:H7. These are the most important cross-reactive bacteria with Brucella. We then evaluated the antibody response of groups of sheep that had been immunised towards homologous antigens and official antigens for brucellosis, in order to identify a differential diagnostic protocol to distinguish cross-reaction in Brucella-infected animals.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

According to European Union (EU) regulations, the serological tests for the eradication of bovine and ovine brucellosis are the Rose Bengal Test, Complement Fixation Test, and i-ELISA. These methods, also recommended by the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) for international trades, have limitations related to the use of suspensions of smooth Brucellae or LPS extracts. Limitations include false-positive serological reactions to brucellosis, which in turn impedes accurate diagnosis in some herds. False positive reactions should be considered carefully during the final stages of an eradication programme and for surveillance purposes in brucellosis-free areas. In this study, we produced specific sera through the experimental infection of sheep with Y. enterocolitica O:9 and E. coli O157:H7. These are the most important cross-reactive bacteria with Brucella. We then evaluated the antibody response of groups of sheep that had been immunised towards homologous antigens and official antigens for brucellosis, in order to identify a differential diagnostic protocol to distinguish cross-reaction in Brucella-infected animals.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 54 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

According to European Union (EU) regulations, the serological tests for the eradication of bovine and ovine brucellosis are the Rose Bengal Test, Complement Fixation Test, and i-ELISA. These methods, also recommended by the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) for international trades, have limitations related to the use of suspensions of smooth Brucellae or LPS extracts. Limitations include false-positive serological reactions to brucellosis, which in turn impedes accurate diagnosis in some herds. False positive reactions should be considered carefully during the final stages of an eradication programme and for surveillance purposes in brucellosis-free areas. In this study, we produced specific sera through the experimental infection of sheep with Y. enterocolitica O:9 and E. coli O157:H7. These are the most important cross-reactive bacteria with Brucella. We then evaluated the antibody response of groups of sheep that had been immunised towards homologous antigens and official antigens for brucellosis, in order to identify a differential diagnostic protocol to distinguish cross-reaction in Brucella-infected animals.

Key concepts: Brucellosis, Yersinia enterocolitica, Complement fixation test, Serology, Brucella, Brucella abortus, Antigen, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cross-reactivity in serological tests for brucellosis: a comparison of immune response of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 vs Brucella spp. — Research Paper | ScholarLens