International humanitarian law application
Geoffrey S. Corn, Ken Watkin, Jamie Williamson
Abstract
Geoffrey S. Corn, Ken Watkin, Jamie Williamson
Abstract
International humanitarian law, unlike most areas of domestic law, is not constantly in force. The authors use this foundational chapter to determine under what conditions, and to what extent IHL is applicable in a given type of conflict. Following a brief introduction, Part 2 begins by assessing IHL’s two legal triggers—Common Articles 2 and 3 to the 1949 Geneva Conventions—which each invoke separate bodies of law. The significance of the term “armed conflict” is then more fully discussed, as well as how exactly the nature of an armed conflict, be it inter-State or intra-State, affects the application of IHL. Part 3 then transitions to the impacts of the two 1977 Protocols Additional to the 1949 Geneva Conventions, and Part 4 concludes by discussing a few significant wrinkles in the traditional IHL application equation. This includes topics like external State intervention in an ongoing international armed conflict, situations questionably armed conflicts, transnational armed conflicts, and IHL’s intersection with international human rights law.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
International humanitarian law, unlike most areas of domestic law, is not constantly in force. The authors use this foundational chapter to determine under what conditions, and to what extent IHL is applicable in a given type of conflict. Following a brief introduction, Part 2 begins by assessing IHL’s two legal triggers—Common Articles 2 and 3 to the 1949 Geneva Conventions—which each invoke separate bodies of law. The significance of the term “armed conflict” is then more fully discussed, as well as how exactly the nature of an armed conflict, be it inter-State or intra-State, affects the application of IHL. Part 3 then transitions to the impacts of the two 1977 Protocols Additional to the 1949 Geneva Conventions, and Part 4 concludes by discussing a few significant wrinkles in the traditional IHL application equation. This includes topics like external State intervention in an ongoing international armed conflict, situations questionably armed conflicts, transnational armed conflicts, and IHL’s intersection with international human rights law.
Key concepts: International humanitarian law, Political science, Law, International law