2018Unpublished venueRequires access

Metropolitan Urban Planning

Melville C. Branch

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

For several centuries a trend toward concentration of activity and population in relatively few urban centers has been observed. This trend has been generally accelerating and spreading from the “developed” to the “developing” countries. For at least a century this centripetal trend has been supplemented by a centrifugal trend from urban centers to their [surroundings]. The resulting new form of human settlement has been recognized as a “Metropolitan Area” by the Census of the U.S.A., and under the same or another name, by many other countries. The Metropolitan Area is essentially defined as a commuter watershed, constituting a common labor and housing market. It has long been recognized that such a concentration leads to a substantial increase of activities and population well beyond its boundaries, up to a travel distance of about two hours from its center. Hans Blumenfeld, “Where Did All the Metropolitanites Go?” Personal Communication , March, 1982.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

For several centuries a trend toward concentration of activity and population in relatively few urban centers has been observed. This trend has been generally accelerating and spreading from the “developed” to the “developing” countries. For at least a century this centripetal trend has been supplemented by a centrifugal trend from urban centers to their [surroundings]. The resulting new form of human settlement has been recognized as a “Metropolitan Area” by the Census of the U.S.A., and under the same or another name, by many other countries. The Metropolitan Area is essentially defined as a commuter watershed, constituting a common labor and housing market. It has long been recognized that such a concentration leads to a substantial increase of activities and population well beyond its boundaries, up to a travel distance of about two hours from its center. Hans Blumenfeld, “Where Did All the Metropolitanites Go?” Personal Communication , March, 1982.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

For several centuries a trend toward concentration of activity and population in relatively few urban centers has been observed. This trend has been generally accelerating and spreading from the “developed” to the “developing” countries. For at least a century this centripetal trend has been supplemented by a centrifugal trend from urban centers to their [surroundings]. The resulting new form of human settlement has been recognized as a “Metropolitan Area” by the Census of the U.S.A., and under the same or another name, by many other countries. The Metropolitan Area is essentially defined as a commuter watershed, constituting a common labor and housing market. It has long been recognized that such a concentration leads to a substantial increase of activities and population well beyond its boundaries, up to a travel distance of about two hours from its center. Hans Blumenfeld, “Where Did All the Metropolitanites Go?” Personal Communication , March, 1982.

Key concepts: Metropolitan area, Geography, Regional science, Archaeology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Metropolitan Urban Planning — Research Paper | ScholarLens