In vitro genotoxic and epigenotoxic effects of occupational exposure to nanofibres
Célia Ventura
Abstract
Open-access reader
Célia Ventura
Abstract
Open-access reader
ABSTRACT - In recent years, human exposure to nanofibres (i.e., fibres with diameters < 100 nm) has considerably increased due to their incorporation in a wide range of consumer products. As such, there is a growing concern that the distinctive physicochemical characteristics of nanofibres may lead to adverse human health effects, mainly by their inhalation in occupational settings. Several toxicological studies have indicated that some nanofibres, such as the MWCNT-7, display in vitro toxicity and induce pulmonary inflammation, fibrosis, granulomas and carcinogenesis in vivo. Others, like cellulose nanofibrills (CNF), seem biocompatible and promising for biomedical applications. Thus, the genotoxic effects of nanofibres must be deeply studied to identify their possible hazard, and new “omics” methodologies can uncover their underlying mechanisms of action. Moreover, distinctive genomic or epigenomic expression profiles may be biomarkers of occupational exposure to nanofibres. In this work, the two above-mentioned nanofibres are analyzed in vitro, and the toxic effects of MWCNT-7 compared to those of crocidolite asbestos. Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity were investigated through conventional assays, and the differentially expressed microRNA (DE miRNA) in alveolar epithelial cells exposed to MWCNT-7 or crocidolite identified by next-generation sequencing. The overall results demonstrate that MWCNT-7 is cytotoxic, genotoxic and immunotoxic. Notably, it induced nucleoplasmic bridges in alveolar cells, possibly due to its resemblance with the microtubules and physical interference with the mitotic spindle. Different viabilities and micronucleus frequencies were observed in alveolar cells when using a conventional monoculture or a co-culture of these cells with macrophages, which may be related to their epithelial-mesenchymal transition and consequent increase of cell resistance to apoptosis. Regarding CNF, at low concentrations it stimulates cell proliferation, whereas at higher ones it is moderately toxic. Although no immunotoxicity and no significant DNA damage were detected, low CNF doses induced micronucleus. Concerning the epigenotoxic study, several DE miRNA were identified in alveolar cells exposed to MWCNT-7 or crocidolite, and a unique set was identified for each exposure. Both materials caused common changes in pathways related to cell metabolism, cell growth and death, cell-to-cell communication, protein processing, and signal transduction. Other functional pathways were distinctively identified for each material that sugest particular mechanisms of action. Since most are cancer related, a network of DE miRNA and target cancer genes was constructed, highlighting the carcinogenic potential of both materials.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
ABSTRACT - In recent years, human exposure to nanofibres (i.e., fibres with diameters < 100 nm) has considerably increased due to their incorporation in a wide range of consumer products. As such, there is a growing concern that the distinctive physicochemical characteristics of nanofibres may lead to adverse human health effects, mainly by their inhalation in occupational settings. Several toxicological studies have indicated that some nanofibres, such as the MWCNT-7, display in vitro toxicity and induce pulmonary inflammation, fibrosis, granulomas and carcinogenesis in vivo. Others, like cellulose nanofibrills (CNF), seem biocompatible and promising for biomedical applications. Thus, the genotoxic effects of nanofibres must be deeply studied to identify their possible hazard, and new “omics” methodologies can uncover their underlying mechanisms of action. Moreover, distinctive genomic or epigenomic expression profiles may be biomarkers of occupational exposure to nanofibres. In this work, the two above-mentioned nanofibres are analyzed in vitro, and the toxic effects of MWCNT-7 compared to those of crocidolite asbestos. Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity were investigated through conventional assays, and the differentially expressed microRNA (DE miRNA) in alveolar epithelial cells exposed to MWCNT-7 or crocidolite identified by next-generation sequencing. The overall results demonstrate that MWCNT-7 is cytotoxic, genotoxic and immunotoxic. Notably, it induced nucleoplasmic bridges in alveolar cells, possibly due to its resemblance with the microtubules and physical interference with the mitotic spindle. Different viabilities and micronucleus frequencies were observed in alveolar cells when using a conventional monoculture or a co-culture of these cells with macrophages, which may be related to their epithelial-mesenchymal transition and consequent increase of cell resistance to apoptosis. Regarding CNF, at low concentrations it stimulates cell proliferation, whereas at higher ones it is moderately toxic. Although no immunotoxicity and no significant DNA damage were detected, low CNF doses induced micronucleus. Concerning the epigenotoxic study, several DE miRNA were identified in alveolar cells exposed to MWCNT-7 or crocidolite, and a unique set was identified for each exposure. Both materials caused common changes in pathways related to cell metabolism, cell growth and death, cell-to-cell communication, protein processing, and signal transduction. Other functional pathways were distinctively identified for each material that sugest particular mechanisms of action. Since most are cancer related, a network of DE miRNA and target cancer genes was constructed, highlighting the carcinogenic potential of both materials.
Key concepts: In vitro, Genotoxicity, Chemistry, Toxicology, Biology, Toxicity, Biochemistry, Organic chemistry