2019•Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & ToxicologyRequires access

A Radiographic Comparison of Crestal Bone Loss Around One-Staged and Two-Staged Implants: An Invivo Study

Gautami Pal, Thilak B Shetty, Shobha J Rodrigues, S M Sharon, Umesh Y Pai, Mahesh, Hegde Puneeth

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: To compare the crestal bone loss (CBL) around implants placed in a submerged or non submerged procedure using radiovisiography. Materials and Method: Implants were placed in the posterior mandible in a split mouth study design. In each edentulous area one implant was inserted using a nonsubmerged procedure (Group 1) where healing abutments were placed after implant installation and in the other implant was placed using a conventional surgical approach (Group 2) .A total of 10 implants were placed in 5 patients . Standardized radiovisiographs were taken immediately after implant insertion, 3 months after implant placement, and 6 months after implant placement. The data were analyzed using ImageJ software and subjected to paired t-test. Results. Three and 6 months after implant placement, the one-stage implants showed significantly more CBL (0.43±.04mm), (0.3±.06mm) than two-stage implants (0.35±07mm), (0.2±.02mm) respectively. Significant differences were found in terms of CBL in the treatment groups being investigated. Conclusion: One-stage implants showed significantly more CBL than two-stage implants

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Purpose: To compare the crestal bone loss (CBL) around implants placed in a submerged or non submerged procedure using radiovisiography. Materials and Method: Implants were placed in the posterior mandible in a split mouth study design. In each edentulous area one implant was inserted using a nonsubmerged procedure (Group 1) where healing abutments were placed after implant installation and in the other implant was placed using a conventional surgical approach (Group 2) .A total of 10 implants were placed in 5 patients . Standardized radiovisiographs were taken immediately after implant insertion, 3 months after implant placement, and 6 months after implant placement. The data were analyzed using ImageJ software and subjected to paired t-test. Results. Three and 6 months after implant placement, the one-stage implants showed significantly more CBL (0.43±.04mm), (0.3±.06mm) than two-stage implants (0.35±07mm), (0.2±.02mm) respectively. Significant differences were found in terms of CBL in the treatment groups being investigated. Conclusion: One-stage implants showed significantly more CBL than two-stage implants

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Purpose: To compare the crestal bone loss (CBL) around implants placed in a submerged or non submerged procedure using radiovisiography. Materials and Method: Implants were placed in the posterior mandible in a split mouth study design. In each edentulous area one implant was inserted using a nonsubmerged procedure (Group 1) where healing abutments were placed after implant installation and in the other implant was placed using a conventional surgical approach (Group 2) .A total of 10 implants were placed in 5 patients . Standardized radiovisiographs were taken immediately after implant insertion, 3 months after implant placement, and 6 months after implant placement. The data were analyzed using ImageJ software and subjected to paired t-test. Results. Three and 6 months after implant placement, the one-stage implants showed significantly more CBL (0.43±.04mm), (0.3±.06mm) than two-stage implants (0.35±07mm), (0.2±.02mm) respectively. Significant differences were found in terms of CBL in the treatment groups being investigated. Conclusion: One-stage implants showed significantly more CBL than two-stage implants

Key concepts: Radiography, Dentistry, Orthodontics, Medicine, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Radiographic Comparison of Crestal Bone Loss Around One-Staged and Two-Staged Implants: An Invivo Study — Research Paper | ScholarLens