Development and validation of Nurse Managers’ Empowering Behavioral Scale for staff nurses
Miki Sasaki, Yasuko Ogata, Noriko Morioka, Yoshie Yumoto, Yuki Yonekura
Abstract
Open-access reader
Miki Sasaki, Yasuko Ogata, Noriko Morioka, Yoshie Yumoto, Yuki Yonekura
Abstract
Open-access reader
Aim: In this study, we developed and verified the Nurse Managers' Empowering Behavioral Scale for Staff Nurses (NMEB-SN). Design: A cross-sectional survey. Methods: The NMEB-SN was developed based on the staff nurses' perspectives. Nurses working in 10 hospitals in Japan were surveyed using a questionnaire to test the scale's validity using construct and criterion-related validity and reliability using internal consistency and test-retest method. There were 1,146 eligible participants included in the process. Results: The scale items resulted in five subscales comprising of 48 items altogether. The goodness-of-fit indices for confirmatory factor analysis were CFI = 0.903 and RMSEA = 0.076. The correlation with external criteria for criterion-related validity was near the expected standard. Further, Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.95-0.97 for each subscale and 0.99 for the overall scale. The reliability and validity of the developed NMEB-SN were verified for staff nurses in Japan.
OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Aim: In this study, we developed and verified the Nurse Managers' Empowering Behavioral Scale for Staff Nurses (NMEB-SN). Design: A cross-sectional survey. Methods: The NMEB-SN was developed based on the staff nurses' perspectives. Nurses working in 10 hospitals in Japan were surveyed using a questionnaire to test the scale's validity using construct and criterion-related validity and reliability using internal consistency and test-retest method. There were 1,146 eligible participants included in the process. Results: The scale items resulted in five subscales comprising of 48 items altogether. The goodness-of-fit indices for confirmatory factor analysis were CFI = 0.903 and RMSEA = 0.076. The correlation with external criteria for criterion-related validity was near the expected standard. Further, Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.95-0.97 for each subscale and 0.99 for the overall scale. The reliability and validity of the developed NMEB-SN were verified for staff nurses in Japan.
Key concepts: Cronbach's alpha, Scale (ratio), Confirmatory factor analysis, Construct validity, Reliability (semiconductor), Goodness of fit, Psychology, Criterion validity