2019International Journal of Nursing KnowledgeRequires access

Reporting Nursing Interventions Classification and Nursing Outcomes Classification in Nursing Research: A Systematic Review

Elham H. Othman, Fedaa Shatnawi, Omymah Zain Alddin Al-Rajabi, Jafar Alasad Alshraideh

Open publisher page 36 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nursing classification systems are used to report nursing practices and maintain a unified documentation language. Nursing interventions classification (NIC) and nursing outcomes classification (NOC) are among the recognized terminology systems. AIM: To examine the extent of reporting NIC/NOC in nursing research. DESIGN: A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines. DATA SOURCES: A literature search in three electronic databases was performed. RESULTS: A total of (18) articles were included. Nine studies were conducted to describe the commonly used NIC/NOC, six studies validated the effectiveness of classification systems, and two studies compared different nursing classification systems. CONCLUSION: The available evidence is limited by the quality of the studies. We recommend examining the use of NIC/NOC in nursing documentation using an experimental design.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Nursing classification systems are used to report nursing practices and maintain a unified documentation language. Nursing interventions classification (NIC) and nursing outcomes classification (NOC) are among the recognized terminology systems. AIM: To examine the extent of reporting NIC/NOC in nursing research. DESIGN: A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines. DATA SOURCES: A literature search in three electronic databases was performed. RESULTS: A total of (18) articles were included. Nine studies were conducted to describe the commonly used NIC/NOC, six studies validated the effectiveness of classification systems, and two studies compared different nursing classification systems. CONCLUSION: The available evidence is limited by the quality of the studies. We recommend examining the use of NIC/NOC in nursing documentation using an experimental design.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 36 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Nursing classification systems are used to report nursing practices and maintain a unified documentation language. Nursing interventions classification (NIC) and nursing outcomes classification (NOC) are among the recognized terminology systems. AIM: To examine the extent of reporting NIC/NOC in nursing research. DESIGN: A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines. DATA SOURCES: A literature search in three electronic databases was performed. RESULTS: A total of (18) articles were included. Nine studies were conducted to describe the commonly used NIC/NOC, six studies validated the effectiveness of classification systems, and two studies compared different nursing classification systems. CONCLUSION: The available evidence is limited by the quality of the studies. We recommend examining the use of NIC/NOC in nursing documentation using an experimental design.

Key concepts: Nursing Outcomes Classification, Nursing Interventions Classification, Terminology, Nursing, Nursing documentation, Documentation, Nursing research, Nursing Minimum Data Set

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Reporting Nursing Interventions Classification and Nursing Outcomes Classification in Nursing Research: A Systematic Review — Research Paper | ScholarLens