2013•AGU Fall Meeting AbstractsRequires access

Gravity derived crustal thickness models; are the strongest variations resulting from new GOCE data or different techniques?

M. van der Meijde

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This record does not include an abstract. Use the full-text link above if available.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An abstract is not available in the OpenAlex record for this paper.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Key concepts: Geology, Geodesy, Gravimetry, Remote sensing, Geophysics, Seismology, Reservoir modeling, Geotechnical engineering

Back to paper search Browse research topics Original source

Gravity derived crustal thickness models; are the strongest variations resulting from new GOCE data or different techniques? — Research Paper | ScholarLens