2019•European Law ReviewRequires access

Squaring the Circle: High-Quality, Deep FTAs with Australia and New Zealand without the EU Member States’ Approval?

Christian Riffel

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The European Union, on the one hand, and Australia and New Zealand, on the other hand, are committed to concluding high-quality, deep free trade agreements (FTAs) as between themselves. On the part of the EU, the ratification of economic integration agreements is complicated because of the involvement of the Member States with their own constitutional requirements. The European Commission, therefore, seeks to fast-track the conclusion of FTAs with these two countries by designing the agreements in a way that would not require the approval of the Member States. Drawing a comparison to the FTA with Japan (JEEPA), the present article seeks to analyse what triggers the need for Member States’ approval, and explicates what changes negotiators would need to make in relation to an EU–Australia/New Zealand FTA. In particular, could such an agreement have chapters on “trade and” topics in the style of JEEPA without making ratification by the Member States a requirement?

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The European Union, on the one hand, and Australia and New Zealand, on the other hand, are committed to concluding high-quality, deep free trade agreements (FTAs) as between themselves. On the part of the EU, the ratification of economic integration agreements is complicated because of the involvement of the Member States with their own constitutional requirements. The European Commission, therefore, seeks to fast-track the conclusion of FTAs with these two countries by designing the agreements in a way that would not require the approval of the Member States. Drawing a comparison to the FTA with Japan (JEEPA), the present article seeks to analyse what triggers the need for Member States’ approval, and explicates what changes negotiators would need to make in relation to an EU–Australia/New Zealand FTA. In particular, could such an agreement have chapters on “trade and” topics in the style of JEEPA without making ratification by the Member States a requirement?

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The European Union, on the one hand, and Australia and New Zealand, on the other hand, are committed to concluding high-quality, deep free trade agreements (FTAs) as between themselves. On the part of the EU, the ratification of economic integration agreements is complicated because of the involvement of the Member States with their own constitutional requirements. The European Commission, therefore, seeks to fast-track the conclusion of FTAs with these two countries by designing the agreements in a way that would not require the approval of the Member States. Drawing a comparison to the FTA with Japan (JEEPA), the present article seeks to analyse what triggers the need for Member States’ approval, and explicates what changes negotiators would need to make in relation to an EU–Australia/New Zealand FTA. In particular, could such an agreement have chapters on “trade and” topics in the style of JEEPA without making ratification by the Member States a requirement?

Key concepts: Ratification, Member states, International trade, Member state, European union, Political science, European commission, Commission

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Squaring the Circle: High-Quality, Deep FTAs with Australia and New Zealand without the EU Member States’ Approval? — Research Paper | ScholarLens