2014•Gansu Medical JournalRequires access

Clinical observation on seasonal a llergic rhinitis patients treated by azelastine hydrochloride nasal spray and triamcinolone acetonide nasal spray

Xun Man-xiang, Jia Liu, Jia-xiong Zhang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To investigate clinical effect of azelastine hydrochloride nasal spray and triamcinolone acetonide nasal spray on seasonal allergic rhinitis patients. Methods: 120 seasonal allergic rhinitis patients were divided into treatment A group(42 cases), and control B(38 cases),control C group(40 cases) in which treatment A group was treated by azelastine hydrochloride nasal spray and triamcinolone acetonide nasal apray,control B group was treated by azelastine hydrochloride nasal spray,control C was treated by triamcinolone acetonide nasal spray. The period of treatment was 3 months, a total of 120 days. Results: The total effective rate of treatment A group was 93.75%,which was obviously superior to control group(P <0.05). Conclusion: The treatment of azelastine hydrochloride nasal spray and triamcinolone acetonide nasal spray is very effective for seasonal allergic rhinitis patients.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To investigate clinical effect of azelastine hydrochloride nasal spray and triamcinolone acetonide nasal spray on seasonal allergic rhinitis patients. Methods: 120 seasonal allergic rhinitis patients were divided into treatment A group(42 cases), and control B(38 cases),control C group(40 cases) in which treatment A group was treated by azelastine hydrochloride nasal spray and triamcinolone acetonide nasal apray,control B group was treated by azelastine hydrochloride nasal spray,control C was treated by triamcinolone acetonide nasal spray. The period of treatment was 3 months, a total of 120 days. Results: The total effective rate of treatment A group was 93.75%,which was obviously superior to control group(P <0.05). Conclusion: The treatment of azelastine hydrochloride nasal spray and triamcinolone acetonide nasal spray is very effective for seasonal allergic rhinitis patients.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To investigate clinical effect of azelastine hydrochloride nasal spray and triamcinolone acetonide nasal spray on seasonal allergic rhinitis patients. Methods: 120 seasonal allergic rhinitis patients were divided into treatment A group(42 cases), and control B(38 cases),control C group(40 cases) in which treatment A group was treated by azelastine hydrochloride nasal spray and triamcinolone acetonide nasal apray,control B group was treated by azelastine hydrochloride nasal spray,control C was treated by triamcinolone acetonide nasal spray. The period of treatment was 3 months, a total of 120 days. Results: The total effective rate of treatment A group was 93.75%,which was obviously superior to control group(P <0.05). Conclusion: The treatment of azelastine hydrochloride nasal spray and triamcinolone acetonide nasal spray is very effective for seasonal allergic rhinitis patients.

Key concepts: Azelastine, Medicine, Nasal spray, Triamcinolone acetonide, Anesthesia, Acetonide, Dermatology, Nasal administration

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical observation on seasonal a llergic rhinitis patients treated by azelastine hydrochloride nasal spray and triamcinolone acetonide nasal spray — Research Paper | ScholarLens