Predictions of α decay half-lives for even–even superheavy nuclei with 104 ≤ Z ≤ 128 based on two-potential approach within cluster-formation model
Hong-Ming Liu, Jun-Yao Xu, J. Deng, Biao He, Xiao‐Hua Li
Abstract
Hong-Ming Liu, Jun-Yao Xu, J. Deng, Biao He, Xiao‐Hua Li
Abstract
In this work, we systematically study the [Formula: see text] decay half-lives of 170 even–even nuclei with [Formula: see text] within the two-potential approach while the [Formula: see text] decay preformation factor [Formula: see text] is obtained by the cluster-formation model. The calculated results can well reproduce the experimental data. In addition, we extend this model to predict the [Formula: see text] decay half-lives of 64 even–even nuclei with [Formula: see text] whose [Formula: see text] decay is energetically allowed or observed but not yet quantified. For comparison, the two famous models i.e., SemFIS proposed by Poenaru et al. [Europhys. Lett. 77 (2007) 62001] and UDL proposed by Qi et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009) 072501] are used. The predicted results of these models are basically consistent. At the same time, through analyzing the changing trend of [Formula: see text] decay energy [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text] and 128 isotopes nuclei with the increasing of neutron number N and that of [Formula: see text] decay preformation factor [Formula: see text] of those isotopes even–even nuclei with the increasing of neutron number N, [Formula: see text] may be a new neutron magic number.
OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In this work, we systematically study the [Formula: see text] decay half-lives of 170 even–even nuclei with [Formula: see text] within the two-potential approach while the [Formula: see text] decay preformation factor [Formula: see text] is obtained by the cluster-formation model. The calculated results can well reproduce the experimental data. In addition, we extend this model to predict the [Formula: see text] decay half-lives of 64 even–even nuclei with [Formula: see text] whose [Formula: see text] decay is energetically allowed or observed but not yet quantified. For comparison, the two famous models i.e., SemFIS proposed by Poenaru et al. [Europhys. Lett. 77 (2007) 62001] and UDL proposed by Qi et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009) 072501] are used. The predicted results of these models are basically consistent. At the same time, through analyzing the changing trend of [Formula: see text] decay energy [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text] and 128 isotopes nuclei with the increasing of neutron number N and that of [Formula: see text] decay preformation factor [Formula: see text] of those isotopes even–even nuclei with the increasing of neutron number N, [Formula: see text] may be a new neutron magic number.
Key concepts: Physics, Isotope, Neutron, Nuclear physics, Neutron number, Energy (signal processing), Cluster (spacecraft), Magic number (chemistry)