2018Unpublished venueRequires access

Adult learning and the concept of social participation

Seán Courtney

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This chapter aims to draw attention to the distinction between ‘learning’ and ‘participation’ by exploring the notion of participation, especially as it has been used beyond the field of adult education, to see what light it may throw on the causes of adult learning. Participation comes to adult education via the discipline of sociology. A theme running through both urban and community studies was that of ‘social participation’ in all its many and varied forms. G. Beal began by criticizing the tendency to see and measure participation in voluntary associations in the standard way: membership, attendance, contributions, membership on committees and holding office, as if the phenomenon had nothing to do with the type of organization being studied. Organizations such as voluntary associations, as described by A. Booth and J. Edwards, H. Wilensky and others, are in many cases extensions of earlier systems designed to socialize the individual and acculturate him or her to the dominant social forms.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter aims to draw attention to the distinction between ‘learning’ and ‘participation’ by exploring the notion of participation, especially as it has been used beyond the field of adult education, to see what light it may throw on the causes of adult learning. Participation comes to adult education via the discipline of sociology. A theme running through both urban and community studies was that of ‘social participation’ in all its many and varied forms. G. Beal began by criticizing the tendency to see and measure participation in voluntary associations in the standard way: membership, attendance, contributions, membership on committees and holding office, as if the phenomenon had nothing to do with the type of organization being studied. Organizations such as voluntary associations, as described by A. Booth and J. Edwards, H. Wilensky and others, are in many cases extensions of earlier systems designed to socialize the individual and acculturate him or her to the dominant social forms.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter aims to draw attention to the distinction between ‘learning’ and ‘participation’ by exploring the notion of participation, especially as it has been used beyond the field of adult education, to see what light it may throw on the causes of adult learning. Participation comes to adult education via the discipline of sociology. A theme running through both urban and community studies was that of ‘social participation’ in all its many and varied forms. G. Beal began by criticizing the tendency to see and measure participation in voluntary associations in the standard way: membership, attendance, contributions, membership on committees and holding office, as if the phenomenon had nothing to do with the type of organization being studied. Organizations such as voluntary associations, as described by A. Booth and J. Edwards, H. Wilensky and others, are in many cases extensions of earlier systems designed to socialize the individual and acculturate him or her to the dominant social forms.

Key concepts: Psychology, Social learning, Sociology, Pedagogy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Adult learning and the concept of social participation — Research Paper | ScholarLens