2014ISEE Conference AbstractsRequires access

Biomonitoring of Urinary Organic and Inorganic Arsenic in Four Different Polluted Areas in Italy

Fabrizio Bianchi, Alessio Coi, Liliana Cori, Fabrizio Minichilli, Elisa Bustaffa

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Introduction The exposure assessment to low-moderate levels of environmental arsenic, As, and defining markers of exposure for surveillance in polluted areas represent challenging objectives for research and public health. Materials and Methods A Human Biomonitoring Survey on As, funded by the Ministry of Health (CCM), was carried out in four polluted areas: Amiata and Viterbo with anthropogenic sources, Taranto and Gela with industrial sources. 271 subjects, 132 men, aged 20-44, were randomly sampled stratifing by area, gender and age classes. Individual data on Residential history, Socio-economic status, Environmental and occupational exposure, Life style, dietary habits were collected by questionnaire; concentration of iAs, MMA, DMA in urine was measured. The distributions of iAs and iAs+MMA+DMA were described by area and gender, by geometric mean GM, percentiles, SD. Multiple Regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between As level and dichotomy variables; GM Ratios (GMR) were calculated. Results High variability of As within and among areas was observed. Gela and Taranto samples had higher iAs concentration (GM 3,1 and 3.3 µg/L), compared to Viterbo (GM 1.9 µg/L) Amiata (GM 0.9 µg/L). Subjects with iAs > 1.5 µg/L and iAs+MMA+DMA>15 µg/L were 137 (50.6%) and 68 (25.1). Viterbo, characterized by As contaminated drinking water, showed a positive association between iAs and tap water consumption (GMR 2.513, p=0.10). Gela and Taranto, showed a positive association between iAs and occupational exposure (Gela: GMR 2.4 µg/L, p<0.01; Taranto: GMR 2.1, p<0.01). Fish consumption is associated with higher iAs concentration in the whole sample (GMR 1.5, p<0.05), particularly in men of Gela (GMR 2.4, p<0.01). Similar results were observed using Asi+MMA+DMA . Conclusion Results are relevant to identify and take care subjects outliers for inorganic-organic arsenic and to aim primary prevention measure for decreasing the level of population exposure.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction The exposure assessment to low-moderate levels of environmental arsenic, As, and defining markers of exposure for surveillance in polluted areas represent challenging objectives for research and public health. Materials and Methods A Human Biomonitoring Survey on As, funded by the Ministry of Health (CCM), was carried out in four polluted areas: Amiata and Viterbo with anthropogenic sources, Taranto and Gela with industrial sources. 271 subjects, 132 men, aged 20-44, were randomly sampled stratifing by area, gender and age classes. Individual data on Residential history, Socio-economic status, Environmental and occupational exposure, Life style, dietary habits were collected by questionnaire; concentration of iAs, MMA, DMA in urine was measured. The distributions of iAs and iAs+MMA+DMA were described by area and gender, by geometric mean GM, percentiles, SD. Multiple Regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between As level and dichotomy variables; GM Ratios (GMR) were calculated. Results High variability of As within and among areas was observed. Gela and Taranto samples had higher iAs concentration (GM 3,1 and 3.3 µg/L), compared to Viterbo (GM 1.9 µg/L) Amiata (GM 0.9 µg/L). Subjects with iAs > 1.5 µg/L and iAs+MMA+DMA>15 µg/L were 137 (50.6%) and 68 (25.1). Viterbo, characterized by As contaminated drinking water, showed a positive association between iAs and tap water consumption (GMR 2.513, p=0.10). Gela and Taranto, showed a positive association between iAs and occupational exposure (Gela: GMR 2.4 µg/L, p<0.01; Taranto: GMR 2.1, p<0.01). Fish consumption is associated with higher iAs concentration in the whole sample (GMR 1.5, p<0.05), particularly in men of Gela (GMR 2.4, p<0.01). Similar results were observed using Asi+MMA+DMA . Conclusion Results are relevant to identify and take care subjects outliers for inorganic-organic arsenic and to aim primary prevention measure for decreasing the level of population exposure.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction The exposure assessment to low-moderate levels of environmental arsenic, As, and defining markers of exposure for surveillance in polluted areas represent challenging objectives for research and public health. Materials and Methods A Human Biomonitoring Survey on As, funded by the Ministry of Health (CCM), was carried out in four polluted areas: Amiata and Viterbo with anthropogenic sources, Taranto and Gela with industrial sources. 271 subjects, 132 men, aged 20-44, were randomly sampled stratifing by area, gender and age classes. Individual data on Residential history, Socio-economic status, Environmental and occupational exposure, Life style, dietary habits were collected by questionnaire; concentration of iAs, MMA, DMA in urine was measured. The distributions of iAs and iAs+MMA+DMA were described by area and gender, by geometric mean GM, percentiles, SD. Multiple Regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between As level and dichotomy variables; GM Ratios (GMR) were calculated. Results High variability of As within and among areas was observed. Gela and Taranto samples had higher iAs concentration (GM 3,1 and 3.3 µg/L), compared to Viterbo (GM 1.9 µg/L) Amiata (GM 0.9 µg/L). Subjects with iAs > 1.5 µg/L and iAs+MMA+DMA>15 µg/L were 137 (50.6%) and 68 (25.1). Viterbo, characterized by As contaminated drinking water, showed a positive association between iAs and tap water consumption (GMR 2.513, p=0.10). Gela and Taranto, showed a positive association between iAs and occupational exposure (Gela: GMR 2.4 µg/L, p<0.01; Taranto: GMR 2.1, p<0.01). Fish consumption is associated with higher iAs concentration in the whole sample (GMR 1.5, p<0.05), particularly in men of Gela (GMR 2.4, p<0.01). Similar results were observed using Asi+MMA+DMA . Conclusion Results are relevant to identify and take care subjects outliers for inorganic-organic arsenic and to aim primary prevention measure for decreasing the level of population exposure.

Key concepts: Biomonitoring, Christian ministry, Arsenic, Environmental health, Toxicology, Environmental chemistry, Medicine, Chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Biomonitoring of Urinary Organic and Inorganic Arsenic in Four Different Polluted Areas in Italy — Research Paper | ScholarLens