2019Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)Open access

EU Competition Policy and Market Liberalization; Using the Gazprom Antitrust Case to Examine the EU Influence on Russian Energy Policy

David N. Hager

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

To examine the EU influence on Russian energy policy, this thesis isolates EU competition policy in natural gas markets and considers the European Commission’s antitrust proceedings against Russian-state owned Gazprom. By applying the neofunctionalist principle of spillover to natural gas markets, I examine the degree to which the EU has influenced Russian energy policy. I find there exists no visible change in domestic energy policy of Russia due to the implementation of competition rules in the EU internal energy market. By examining the Gazprom antirust case, I find that the EU’s competition policy has weakened the ability of the Kremlin to use Gazprom as a tool of foreign policy. With these findings, we are able to better understand the means by which the Russian federation is able to coerce energy importing Member States using natural gas as political leverage.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To examine the EU influence on Russian energy policy, this thesis isolates EU competition policy in natural gas markets and considers the European Commission’s antitrust proceedings against Russian-state owned Gazprom. By applying the neofunctionalist principle of spillover to natural gas markets, I examine the degree to which the EU has influenced Russian energy policy. I find there exists no visible change in domestic energy policy of Russia due to the implementation of competition rules in the EU internal energy market. By examining the Gazprom antirust case, I find that the EU’s competition policy has weakened the ability of the Kremlin to use Gazprom as a tool of foreign policy. With these findings, we are able to better understand the means by which the Russian federation is able to coerce energy importing Member States using natural gas as political leverage.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To examine the EU influence on Russian energy policy, this thesis isolates EU competition policy in natural gas markets and considers the European Commission’s antitrust proceedings against Russian-state owned Gazprom. By applying the neofunctionalist principle of spillover to natural gas markets, I examine the degree to which the EU has influenced Russian energy policy. I find there exists no visible change in domestic energy policy of Russia due to the implementation of competition rules in the EU internal energy market. By examining the Gazprom antirust case, I find that the EU’s competition policy has weakened the ability of the Kremlin to use Gazprom as a tool of foreign policy. With these findings, we are able to better understand the means by which the Russian federation is able to coerce energy importing Member States using natural gas as political leverage.

Key concepts: International trade, Liberalization, International economics, Competition (biology), Competition policy, Economics, Energy market, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
EU Competition Policy and Market Liberalization; Using the Gazprom Antitrust Case to Examine the EU Influence on Russian Energy Policy — Research Paper | ScholarLens