2000•Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British VolumeOpen access

Precision of the measurements of periprosthetic bone mineral density in hips with a custom-made femoral stem

Franz Martini, Carmen Lebherz, F. O. Mayer, Ulf Gunther Leichtle, Elisabeth Kremling, Stefan Sell

Open full text 43 citations

Abstract

O ur aim was to determine the precision of the measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in the proximal femur before and after implantation of an uncemented implant, with particular regard to the significance of retro-and prospective studies.We examined 60 patients to determine the difference in preoperative BMD between osteoarthritic and healthy hips.The results showed a preoperative BMD of the affected hip which was lower by a mean of 4% and by a maximum of 9% compared with the opposite side.In addition, measurements were made in the operated hip before and at ten days after operation to determine the effect of the implantation of an uncemented custom-made femoral stem.The mean increase in the BMD was 8% and the maximum was 24%.Previous retrospective studies have reported a marked loss of BMD on the operated side.The precision of double measurements using a special foot jig showed a modified coefficient of variation of 0.6% for the non-operated side in 15 patients and of 0.6% for the operated femur in 20 patients.The effect of rotation on the precision of the measurements after implantation of an uncemented femoral stem was determined in ten explanted femora and for the operated side in ten patients at 10° rotation and in 20 patients at 30° rotation.Rotation within 30° influenced the precision in studies in vivo and in vitro by a mean of 3% and in single cases in up to 60%.Precise prediction of the degree of loss of BMD is thus only possible in prospective cross-sectional measurements, since the effect of the difference in preoperative BMD, as well as the apparent increase in BMD after implantation of an uncemented stem, is not known from retrospective studies.The DEXA method is a reliable procedure for determining periprosthetic BMD when positioning and rotation are strictly controlled.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

O ur aim was to determine the precision of the measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in the proximal femur before and after implantation of an uncemented implant, with particular regard to the significance of retro-and prospective studies.We examined 60 patients to determine the difference in preoperative BMD between osteoarthritic and healthy hips.The results showed a preoperative BMD of the affected hip which was lower by a mean of 4% and by a maximum of 9% compared with the opposite side.In addition, measurements were made in the operated hip before and at ten days after operation to determine the effect of the implantation of an uncemented custom-made femoral stem.The mean increase in the BMD was 8% and the maximum was 24%.Previous retrospective studies have reported a marked loss of BMD on the operated side.The precision of double measurements using a special foot jig showed a modified coefficient of variation of 0.6% for the non-operated side in 15 patients and of 0.6% for the operated femur in 20 patients.The effect of rotation on the precision of the measurements after implantation of an uncemented femoral stem was determined in ten explanted femora and for the operated side in ten patients at 10° rotation and in 20 patients at 30° rotation.Rotation within 30° influenced the precision in studies in vivo and in vitro by a mean of 3% and in single cases in up to 60%.Precise prediction of the degree of loss of BMD is thus only possible in prospective cross-sectional measurements, since the effect of the difference in preoperative BMD, as well as the apparent increase in BMD after implantation of an uncemented stem, is not known from retrospective studies.The DEXA method is a reliable procedure for determining periprosthetic BMD when positioning and rotation are strictly controlled.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 43 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

O ur aim was to determine the precision of the measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in the proximal femur before and after implantation of an uncemented implant, with particular regard to the significance of retro-and prospective studies.We examined 60 patients to determine the difference in preoperative BMD between osteoarthritic and healthy hips.The results showed a preoperative BMD of the affected hip which was lower by a mean of 4% and by a maximum of 9% compared with the opposite side.In addition, measurements were made in the operated hip before and at ten days after operation to determine the effect of the implantation of an uncemented custom-made femoral stem.The mean increase in the BMD was 8% and the maximum was 24%.Previous retrospective studies have reported a marked loss of BMD on the operated side.The precision of double measurements using a special foot jig showed a modified coefficient of variation of 0.6% for the non-operated side in 15 patients and of 0.6% for the operated femur in 20 patients.The effect of rotation on the precision of the measurements after implantation of an uncemented femoral stem was determined in ten explanted femora and for the operated side in ten patients at 10° rotation and in 20 patients at 30° rotation.Rotation within 30° influenced the precision in studies in vivo and in vitro by a mean of 3% and in single cases in up to 60%.Precise prediction of the degree of loss of BMD is thus only possible in prospective cross-sectional measurements, since the effect of the difference in preoperative BMD, as well as the apparent increase in BMD after implantation of an uncemented stem, is not known from retrospective studies.The DEXA method is a reliable procedure for determining periprosthetic BMD when positioning and rotation are strictly controlled.

Key concepts: Periprosthetic, Medicine, Bone mineral, Femur, Implant, Bone density, Surgery, Orthopedic surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Precision of the measurements of periprosthetic bone mineral density in hips with a custom-made femoral stem — Research Paper | ScholarLens