ASPHALT OVERLAYS OF CONCRETE PAVEMENTS: CASE STUDIES IN ARKANSAS
Daniel L. Flowers, Jim Gee, Alan Meadors
Abstract
Daniel L. Flowers, Jim Gee, Alan Meadors
Abstract
The rutting problems on two sections of Interstate highway in Arkansas are discussed in this paper. The original asphalt concrete overlays of concrete pavement placed in the late 1970s consisted of a total asphalt thickness of approximately 8.5 in. Immediate rutting on one of the overlay jobs led to a reevaluation of Arkansas mix design practices. Modifications made in the mix designs included changing to a 75-blow Marshall design and following AASHTO T245 (Resistance to Plastic Flow of Bituminous Mixtures Using Marshall Apparatus) with no alterations. The rutted overlay was milled and surfaced using the new mix design practice. After 6 yr of service, the new overlay is again performing poorly. The other asphalt concrete overlay in another part of the state, however, continues to perform well after 12 yr of service. Other factors not addressed by the Marshall design procedure must therefore have contributed to the difference in pavement performance between the two projects.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The rutting problems on two sections of Interstate highway in Arkansas are discussed in this paper. The original asphalt concrete overlays of concrete pavement placed in the late 1970s consisted of a total asphalt thickness of approximately 8.5 in. Immediate rutting on one of the overlay jobs led to a reevaluation of Arkansas mix design practices. Modifications made in the mix designs included changing to a 75-blow Marshall design and following AASHTO T245 (Resistance to Plastic Flow of Bituminous Mixtures Using Marshall Apparatus) with no alterations. The rutted overlay was milled and surfaced using the new mix design practice. After 6 yr of service, the new overlay is again performing poorly. The other asphalt concrete overlay in another part of the state, however, continues to perform well after 12 yr of service. Other factors not addressed by the Marshall design procedure must therefore have contributed to the difference in pavement performance between the two projects.
Key concepts: Overlay, Rut, Asphalt, Engineering, Asphalt pavement, Service life, Civil engineering, Asphalt concrete