2019Journal of Asian American StudiesRequires access

Asian American Studies, Comparative Racialization, and Settler Colonial Critique

Antonio T. Tiongson

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

This article explores how Asian American studies as a disciplinary formation and as a political and intellectual project is engaging with the Indigenous and settler colonial turns reverberating across multiple disciplines. It interrogates the question of what it would mean for Asian American studies to engage with issues and concerns raised by Native theorizing in terms of the cohering assumptions and anchoring terms of the field. It looks to particular strands of writing within Asian American studies as an archive that sheds light on the field’s multivalent yet uneven engagements with Indigenous studies. The article concludes with a consideration of more recent works in Asian American studies that aim to further extend the field’s critical reach and open up critical dialogue between Asian American studies and Indigenous studies. It looks to these works as an index charting possible future directions for Asian American studies and its various projects.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article explores how Asian American studies as a disciplinary formation and as a political and intellectual project is engaging with the Indigenous and settler colonial turns reverberating across multiple disciplines. It interrogates the question of what it would mean for Asian American studies to engage with issues and concerns raised by Native theorizing in terms of the cohering assumptions and anchoring terms of the field. It looks to particular strands of writing within Asian American studies as an archive that sheds light on the field’s multivalent yet uneven engagements with Indigenous studies. The article concludes with a consideration of more recent works in Asian American studies that aim to further extend the field’s critical reach and open up critical dialogue between Asian American studies and Indigenous studies. It looks to these works as an index charting possible future directions for Asian American studies and its various projects.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article explores how Asian American studies as a disciplinary formation and as a political and intellectual project is engaging with the Indigenous and settler colonial turns reverberating across multiple disciplines. It interrogates the question of what it would mean for Asian American studies to engage with issues and concerns raised by Native theorizing in terms of the cohering assumptions and anchoring terms of the field. It looks to particular strands of writing within Asian American studies as an archive that sheds light on the field’s multivalent yet uneven engagements with Indigenous studies. The article concludes with a consideration of more recent works in Asian American studies that aim to further extend the field’s critical reach and open up critical dialogue between Asian American studies and Indigenous studies. It looks to these works as an index charting possible future directions for Asian American studies and its various projects.

Key concepts: Racialization, Indigenous, Colonialism, Asian studies, Discipline, American studies, Latino studies, Native American studies

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Asian American Studies, Comparative Racialization, and Settler Colonial Critique — Research Paper | ScholarLens