2019GutRequires access

Differences in delta virus hepatitis diagnosis methods and its effect on the hepatitis D prevalence

Danting Shen, Hemant Goyal, Hua‐Guo Xu

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

We thank H Wedemeyer and F Negro for their critical commentary about our article.1 The authors acknowledge that the global disease burden of hepatitis D virus (HDV) is higher than previously estimated. However, they emphasised limitation of this systematic review and meta-analysis that about one-third of anti-HDV-positive patients can have undetectable HDV RNA levels and the global disease burden estimated by only anti-HDV-positivity rate might not reflect the true prevalence of HDV.2 We agree with the authors that synchronous detection of anti-HDV antibodies and HDV RNA is necessary to diagnose the …

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We thank H Wedemeyer and F Negro for their critical commentary about our article.1 The authors acknowledge that the global disease burden of hepatitis D virus (HDV) is higher than previously estimated. However, they emphasised limitation of this systematic review and meta-analysis that about one-third of anti-HDV-positive patients can have undetectable HDV RNA levels and the global disease burden estimated by only anti-HDV-positivity rate might not reflect the true prevalence of HDV.2 We agree with the authors that synchronous detection of anti-HDV antibodies and HDV RNA is necessary to diagnose the …

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We thank H Wedemeyer and F Negro for their critical commentary about our article.1 The authors acknowledge that the global disease burden of hepatitis D virus (HDV) is higher than previously estimated. However, they emphasised limitation of this systematic review and meta-analysis that about one-third of anti-HDV-positive patients can have undetectable HDV RNA levels and the global disease burden estimated by only anti-HDV-positivity rate might not reflect the true prevalence of HDV.2 We agree with the authors that synchronous detection of anti-HDV antibodies and HDV RNA is necessary to diagnose the …

Key concepts: Hepatitis D virus, Hepatitis D, Virology, HEPATITIS DELTA, Medicine, Disease, Virus, Hepatitis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Differences in delta virus hepatitis diagnosis methods and its effect on the hepatitis D prevalence — Research Paper | ScholarLens