2019Unpublished venueRequires access

The Federal-State Relationship in Health Care Reform: A View from the Trenches

Jean I. Thorne

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The advent of Medicare and Medicaid in the mid-1960s dramatically changed the dynamics of health care policy. The Medicare program was designed to provide assistance to states in paying for the health care costs of those families on the federal-state welfare program, as well as to low-income elderly, blind, and disabled persons. Medicaid is a federal-state partnership in which the national government matches state expenditures for services provided to Medicaid-eligible clients. During the 1989 legislative session, a political consensus formed among a broad array of interest groups to develop and pass comprehensive health reform. Both the tax credit program and high-risk pool were initiatives we could undertake without federal approval. The initial major undertaking, however, involved the reform of the Medicaid program. The center of the controversy over Oregon&s;s plan was with our proposal to determine benefits based on a priority list of health services.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The advent of Medicare and Medicaid in the mid-1960s dramatically changed the dynamics of health care policy. The Medicare program was designed to provide assistance to states in paying for the health care costs of those families on the federal-state welfare program, as well as to low-income elderly, blind, and disabled persons. Medicaid is a federal-state partnership in which the national government matches state expenditures for services provided to Medicaid-eligible clients. During the 1989 legislative session, a political consensus formed among a broad array of interest groups to develop and pass comprehensive health reform. Both the tax credit program and high-risk pool were initiatives we could undertake without federal approval. The initial major undertaking, however, involved the reform of the Medicaid program. The center of the controversy over Oregon&s;s plan was with our proposal to determine benefits based on a priority list of health services.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The advent of Medicare and Medicaid in the mid-1960s dramatically changed the dynamics of health care policy. The Medicare program was designed to provide assistance to states in paying for the health care costs of those families on the federal-state welfare program, as well as to low-income elderly, blind, and disabled persons. Medicaid is a federal-state partnership in which the national government matches state expenditures for services provided to Medicaid-eligible clients. During the 1989 legislative session, a political consensus formed among a broad array of interest groups to develop and pass comprehensive health reform. Both the tax credit program and high-risk pool were initiatives we could undertake without federal approval. The initial major undertaking, however, involved the reform of the Medicaid program. The center of the controversy over Oregon&s;s plan was with our proposal to determine benefits based on a priority list of health services.

Key concepts: State (computer science), Political science, Federal state, Health care, Public administration, Law, Computer science, Algorithm

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Federal-State Relationship in Health Care Reform: A View from the Trenches — Research Paper | ScholarLens