2017PubMedRequires access

[Investigation of status for vascular access in hemodialysis patients at Xiangya Hospital of Central South University].

Yong Zhong, Jiaxi Pu, Xiang Ao, Weisheng Peng, Zhangzhe Peng, Xiaozhao Li, Xiangcheng Xiao, Qiaoling Zhou, Ping Xiao

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the status of vascular access in hemodialysis patients in our center. Methods: The general information of hemodialysis patients and types and complications of vascular access at Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from April 2015 to April 2016, were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Among 258 prevalent patients, 87.60% of them had arteriovenous fistula (AVF), while 12.40% showed tunneled cuffed catheter. Of the 61 incident patients, 80.33% of them initiated dialysis with a non-tunneled and non-cuffed catheter, 8.19% with an AVF, 9.84% with a tunneled cuffed catheter, and 1.64% with needle puncture. The types of AVF access included 76.55% of wrist radiocephalic fistula, 7.08% of mid-forearm cephalic fistula, 11.06% of elbow brachiocephalic fistula, and 5.31% of antecubital fistula and transposed basilic fistula. Seventy-seven (34.07%) patients with AVF suffered complications and wherein aneurysms accounted for 24.34%. Conclusion: In maintenance hemodialysis patients, autologous AVF is the prevalent vascular access. In the beginners for dialysis, non-tunneled and non-cuffed catheter are their choice. Additional efforts and incentives may be necessary to improve vascular access during the initiation of hemodialysis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the status of vascular access in hemodialysis patients in our center. Methods: The general information of hemodialysis patients and types and complications of vascular access at Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from April 2015 to April 2016, were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Among 258 prevalent patients, 87.60% of them had arteriovenous fistula (AVF), while 12.40% showed tunneled cuffed catheter. Of the 61 incident patients, 80.33% of them initiated dialysis with a non-tunneled and non-cuffed catheter, 8.19% with an AVF, 9.84% with a tunneled cuffed catheter, and 1.64% with needle puncture. The types of AVF access included 76.55% of wrist radiocephalic fistula, 7.08% of mid-forearm cephalic fistula, 11.06% of elbow brachiocephalic fistula, and 5.31% of antecubital fistula and transposed basilic fistula. Seventy-seven (34.07%) patients with AVF suffered complications and wherein aneurysms accounted for 24.34%. Conclusion: In maintenance hemodialysis patients, autologous AVF is the prevalent vascular access. In the beginners for dialysis, non-tunneled and non-cuffed catheter are their choice. Additional efforts and incentives may be necessary to improve vascular access during the initiation of hemodialysis.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the status of vascular access in hemodialysis patients in our center. Methods: The general information of hemodialysis patients and types and complications of vascular access at Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from April 2015 to April 2016, were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Among 258 prevalent patients, 87.60% of them had arteriovenous fistula (AVF), while 12.40% showed tunneled cuffed catheter. Of the 61 incident patients, 80.33% of them initiated dialysis with a non-tunneled and non-cuffed catheter, 8.19% with an AVF, 9.84% with a tunneled cuffed catheter, and 1.64% with needle puncture. The types of AVF access included 76.55% of wrist radiocephalic fistula, 7.08% of mid-forearm cephalic fistula, 11.06% of elbow brachiocephalic fistula, and 5.31% of antecubital fistula and transposed basilic fistula. Seventy-seven (34.07%) patients with AVF suffered complications and wherein aneurysms accounted for 24.34%. Conclusion: In maintenance hemodialysis patients, autologous AVF is the prevalent vascular access. In the beginners for dialysis, non-tunneled and non-cuffed catheter are their choice. Additional efforts and incentives may be necessary to improve vascular access during the initiation of hemodialysis.

Key concepts: Medicine, Hemodialysis, Arteriovenous fistula, Fistula, Forearm, Catheter, Hemodialysis access, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Investigation of status for vascular access in hemodialysis patients at Xiangya Hospital of Central South University]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens