2019Edward Elgar Publishing eBooksRequires access

Remedies and reality in the law of contract

Catherine Mitchell

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This chapter explores what we know, and what it might be useful to know, about the connection between contract law remedies for breach and commercial reality. It considers three different perspectives on commercial reality: empirical studies of contract; the relational theory of contract; contract law remedies as default rules. The chapter draws out the insights that each perspective presents on legal remedies for breach, highlights the areas where contract remedies appear to deviate from these conceptions of commercial reality, and notes potential areas for further research. One of these areas for future research is whether, in the light of the increasing use of contracts to create essentially private legal systems with bespoke and complex remedial regimes which courts are willing to enforce, the legal default remedies for breach of contract are becoming obsolete.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter explores what we know, and what it might be useful to know, about the connection between contract law remedies for breach and commercial reality. It considers three different perspectives on commercial reality: empirical studies of contract; the relational theory of contract; contract law remedies as default rules. The chapter draws out the insights that each perspective presents on legal remedies for breach, highlights the areas where contract remedies appear to deviate from these conceptions of commercial reality, and notes potential areas for further research. One of these areas for future research is whether, in the light of the increasing use of contracts to create essentially private legal systems with bespoke and complex remedial regimes which courts are willing to enforce, the legal default remedies for breach of contract are becoming obsolete.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter explores what we know, and what it might be useful to know, about the connection between contract law remedies for breach and commercial reality. It considers three different perspectives on commercial reality: empirical studies of contract; the relational theory of contract; contract law remedies as default rules. The chapter draws out the insights that each perspective presents on legal remedies for breach, highlights the areas where contract remedies appear to deviate from these conceptions of commercial reality, and notes potential areas for further research. One of these areas for future research is whether, in the light of the increasing use of contracts to create essentially private legal systems with bespoke and complex remedial regimes which courts are willing to enforce, the legal default remedies for breach of contract are becoming obsolete.

Key concepts: Breach of contract, Bespoke, Exclusion clause, Law, Law and economics, Business, Empirical research, Contract management

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Remedies and reality in the law of contract — Research Paper | ScholarLens