2019Pakistan Journal of PhysiologyOpen access

Role of prophylactic antibiotics in clean surgery

Ziyad Afzal Kayani, Sarmud Latif Awan, Muhammad Arshad Abbasi, Irum Gilani, Naheed Akram, Farzana Sabir

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Background: In general surgery postoperative wound infection is one of the expensive and underrated causes of patient morbidity and the advantages of using prophylactic antibiotics have not been proven. In this study use of prophylactic antibiotics was compared in terms of decreasing postoperative wound infection in clean cases of general surgery. Methods: This study was conducted at Abbas Institute of Medical Sciences (AIMS) Muzaffarabad, from July 2016 to January 2017. The study was approved by Ethical Committee of AIMS. The study involved one hundred patients. Sample size was calculated with WHO sample size estimator to be 93, and was rounded to 100 patients. For patient selection, convenience sampling method was used. All these patients went through clean general surgery operations. These patients were randomly placed in two groups, A and B with fifty patients in each group. All patients gave written informed consent. Injection cephradine (1st generation cephalosporin) 1 g IV 30 minutes prior to operation was administered and continued for 24 hours postoperatively in Group A. On the other hand patients of group B received no antibiotics. Result: In Group A, one patient (2%) and in Group-B, three patients (6%) were found to have wound infection after surgery. According to Chi-square test this low frequency (1/50 vs 3/50) as compared between Group A and B respectively about postoperative wound infection was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Usage of prophylactic antibiotics in clean general surgery is not significantly associated with decreasing the incidence of wound infection after surgery.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: In general surgery postoperative wound infection is one of the expensive and underrated causes of patient morbidity and the advantages of using prophylactic antibiotics have not been proven. In this study use of prophylactic antibiotics was compared in terms of decreasing postoperative wound infection in clean cases of general surgery. Methods: This study was conducted at Abbas Institute of Medical Sciences (AIMS) Muzaffarabad, from July 2016 to January 2017. The study was approved by Ethical Committee of AIMS. The study involved one hundred patients. Sample size was calculated with WHO sample size estimator to be 93, and was rounded to 100 patients. For patient selection, convenience sampling method was used. All these patients went through clean general surgery operations. These patients were randomly placed in two groups, A and B with fifty patients in each group. All patients gave written informed consent. Injection cephradine (1st generation cephalosporin) 1 g IV 30 minutes prior to operation was administered and continued for 24 hours postoperatively in Group A. On the other hand patients of group B received no antibiotics. Result: In Group A, one patient (2%) and in Group-B, three patients (6%) were found to have wound infection after surgery. According to Chi-square test this low frequency (1/50 vs 3/50) as compared between Group A and B respectively about postoperative wound infection was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Usage of prophylactic antibiotics in clean general surgery is not significantly associated with decreasing the incidence of wound infection after surgery.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: In general surgery postoperative wound infection is one of the expensive and underrated causes of patient morbidity and the advantages of using prophylactic antibiotics have not been proven. In this study use of prophylactic antibiotics was compared in terms of decreasing postoperative wound infection in clean cases of general surgery. Methods: This study was conducted at Abbas Institute of Medical Sciences (AIMS) Muzaffarabad, from July 2016 to January 2017. The study was approved by Ethical Committee of AIMS. The study involved one hundred patients. Sample size was calculated with WHO sample size estimator to be 93, and was rounded to 100 patients. For patient selection, convenience sampling method was used. All these patients went through clean general surgery operations. These patients were randomly placed in two groups, A and B with fifty patients in each group. All patients gave written informed consent. Injection cephradine (1st generation cephalosporin) 1 g IV 30 minutes prior to operation was administered and continued for 24 hours postoperatively in Group A. On the other hand patients of group B received no antibiotics. Result: In Group A, one patient (2%) and in Group-B, three patients (6%) were found to have wound infection after surgery. According to Chi-square test this low frequency (1/50 vs 3/50) as compared between Group A and B respectively about postoperative wound infection was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Usage of prophylactic antibiotics in clean general surgery is not significantly associated with decreasing the incidence of wound infection after surgery.

Key concepts: Medicine, Antibiotics, Surgery, Group B, Cephradine, Antibiotic prophylaxis, Incidence (geometry), Cephalosporin

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Role of prophylactic antibiotics in clean surgery — Research Paper | ScholarLens