2019European Heart JournalRequires access

P886Exercise left ventricular outflow track obstruction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: peak exercise or post-exercise pressure gradients?

Y. Nahmani, Naima Hammoudi, Fang‐Yang Huang, Nesrine Bouziri, Françoise Pousset, Carole Maupain, Philippe Charron, Richard Isnard

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Left ventricular outflow track obstruction (LVOTO) is a key feature of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), associated with poor prognosis and requiring specific management in symptomatic patients. Furthermore, new drugs targeting LVOTO are under investigation. Exercise echocardiography is the more relevant test to unmask latent obstruction in patients with HCM and to link obstruction to symptoms during physical activity. However, little is known about the role and impact of obstruction according to the precise time of occurrence during exercise or immediate recovery. Objective We hypothesized that LVOT pressure gradients could be enhanced during immediate recovery after exercise compared to peak exercise in patients with HCM. Methods We conducted an observational, single center and retrospective study and included all the patients with HCM referred to our department between 2010 and 2018 for an exercise echocardiography. All exercises were performed on a bicycle in a semi-supine position and LVOT pressure gradient were recorded continuously during and immediately after exercise in the same position. Results 121 patients with HCM were included (age 49±16 y, 64% male, 59% NYHA 2 and 3, LV ejection fraction 66±7%, max LV wall thickness 19±5 mm, 69% receiving betablockers). Exercise was performed until exhaustion at a mean workload of 118±58 Watts. Overall, the maximal LVOT gradients increased from rest, to peak exercise and recovery (respectively 17±18, 39±43 and 55±60 mmHg, p<0,0001). More than half of the patients (52%) had a gradient ≥30 mmHg at least in one phase, but a maximal gradient ≥50 mmHg (threshold for invasive treatment in symptomatic patients) was observed in only 7% of the population at rest, 25% at peak exercise and 37% at recovery (p<0.001). Finally, a maximal gradient ≥50 mmHg was recorded only during immediate recovery (69±25 mmHg) and not during exercise in 16 patients (13%). None of them experienced post-exercise syncope. Conclusion The time course of significant LVOTO during exercise in HCM should be evaluated carefully. LVOTO is more severe and more prevalent during immediate recovery. Some patients exhibit only significant post-exercise LVOT pressure gradients, which therefore cannot explain limitation during exercise.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Background Left ventricular outflow track obstruction (LVOTO) is a key feature of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), associated with poor prognosis and requiring specific management in symptomatic patients. Furthermore, new drugs targeting LVOTO are under investigation. Exercise echocardiography is the more relevant test to unmask latent obstruction in patients with HCM and to link obstruction to symptoms during physical activity. However, little is known about the role and impact of obstruction according to the precise time of occurrence during exercise or immediate recovery. Objective We hypothesized that LVOT pressure gradients could be enhanced during immediate recovery after exercise compared to peak exercise in patients with HCM. Methods We conducted an observational, single center and retrospective study and included all the patients with HCM referred to our department between 2010 and 2018 for an exercise echocardiography. All exercises were performed on a bicycle in a semi-supine position and LVOT pressure gradient were recorded continuously during and immediately after exercise in the same position. Results 121 patients with HCM were included (age 49±16 y, 64% male, 59% NYHA 2 and 3, LV ejection fraction 66±7%, max LV wall thickness 19±5 mm, 69% receiving betablockers). Exercise was performed until exhaustion at a mean workload of 118±58 Watts. Overall, the maximal LVOT gradients increased from rest, to peak exercise and recovery (respectively 17±18, 39±43 and 55±60 mmHg, p<0,0001). More than half of the patients (52%) had a gradient ≥30 mmHg at least in one phase, but a maximal gradient ≥50 mmHg (threshold for invasive treatment in symptomatic patients) was observed in only 7% of the population at rest, 25% at peak exercise and 37% at recovery (p<0.001). Finally, a maximal gradient ≥50 mmHg was recorded only during immediate recovery (69±25 mmHg) and not during exercise in 16 patients (13%). None of them experienced post-exercise syncope. Conclusion The time course of significant LVOTO during exercise in HCM should be evaluated carefully. LVOTO is more severe and more prevalent during immediate recovery. Some patients exhibit only significant post-exercise LVOT pressure gradients, which therefore cannot explain limitation during exercise.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Background Left ventricular outflow track obstruction (LVOTO) is a key feature of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), associated with poor prognosis and requiring specific management in symptomatic patients. Furthermore, new drugs targeting LVOTO are under investigation. Exercise echocardiography is the more relevant test to unmask latent obstruction in patients with HCM and to link obstruction to symptoms during physical activity. However, little is known about the role and impact of obstruction according to the precise time of occurrence during exercise or immediate recovery. Objective We hypothesized that LVOT pressure gradients could be enhanced during immediate recovery after exercise compared to peak exercise in patients with HCM. Methods We conducted an observational, single center and retrospective study and included all the patients with HCM referred to our department between 2010 and 2018 for an exercise echocardiography. All exercises were performed on a bicycle in a semi-supine position and LVOT pressure gradient were recorded continuously during and immediately after exercise in the same position. Results 121 patients with HCM were included (age 49±16 y, 64% male, 59% NYHA 2 and 3, LV ejection fraction 66±7%, max LV wall thickness 19±5 mm, 69% receiving betablockers). Exercise was performed until exhaustion at a mean workload of 118±58 Watts. Overall, the maximal LVOT gradients increased from rest, to peak exercise and recovery (respectively 17±18, 39±43 and 55±60 mmHg, p<0,0001). More than half of the patients (52%) had a gradient ≥30 mmHg at least in one phase, but a maximal gradient ≥50 mmHg (threshold for invasive treatment in symptomatic patients) was observed in only 7% of the population at rest, 25% at peak exercise and 37% at recovery (p<0.001). Finally, a maximal gradient ≥50 mmHg was recorded only during immediate recovery (69±25 mmHg) and not during exercise in 16 patients (13%). None of them experienced post-exercise syncope. Conclusion The time course of significant LVOTO during exercise in HCM should be evaluated carefully. LVOTO is more severe and more prevalent during immediate recovery. Some patients exhibit only significant post-exercise LVOT pressure gradients, which therefore cannot explain limitation during exercise.

Key concepts: Medicine, Cardiology, Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, Internal medicine, Supine position, Ejection fraction, Ventricular outflow tract obstruction, Cardiomyopathy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
P886Exercise left ventricular outflow track obstruction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: peak exercise or post-exercise pressure gradients? — Research Paper | ScholarLens