Comparison of Mitochondrial Function in Boar and Bull Spermatozoa Throughout Cryopreservation Based on JC-1 Staining.
Chajuan Hu, Xuan Zhuang, Y M Wei, M Zhang, S S Lu, Yangqing Lu, Xiaogan Yang, K.H. Lu
Abstract
Chajuan Hu, Xuan Zhuang, Y M Wei, M Zhang, S S Lu, Yangqing Lu, Xiaogan Yang, K.H. Lu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Poor reproductivity hampers the commercialization of cryopreserved boar semen. OBJECTIVE: This study was to determine the differences in the sperm mitochondrial function between boar and bull semen at different cryopreservation stages. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Boar and bull fresh, equilibrated, and frozen-thawed spermatozoa were evaluated for mitochondrial function using JC-1 under a fluorescent microscope. RESULTS: Bull and boar percentage of spermatozoa staining green (PSSG) showed no difference between fresh and equilibrated semen (P> 0.05). However, frozen-thawed bull and boar semen demonstrated significantly higher PSSG (P < 0.01) than fresh and equilibrated semen. Frozen-thawed boar semen represented a significantly higher PSSG (P < 0.01) than bull semen. CONCLUSION: Negative cryopreservation influence on boar and bull spermatozoa was not significantly produced by pre-freezing procedures, but rather by freezing and thawing. Cryopreservation has more pronounced negative effects on boar than on bull spermatozoa, which partly explains lagged commercialization of frozen boar semen.
OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
BACKGROUND: Poor reproductivity hampers the commercialization of cryopreserved boar semen. OBJECTIVE: This study was to determine the differences in the sperm mitochondrial function between boar and bull semen at different cryopreservation stages. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Boar and bull fresh, equilibrated, and frozen-thawed spermatozoa were evaluated for mitochondrial function using JC-1 under a fluorescent microscope. RESULTS: Bull and boar percentage of spermatozoa staining green (PSSG) showed no difference between fresh and equilibrated semen (P> 0.05). However, frozen-thawed bull and boar semen demonstrated significantly higher PSSG (P < 0.01) than fresh and equilibrated semen. Frozen-thawed boar semen represented a significantly higher PSSG (P < 0.01) than bull semen. CONCLUSION: Negative cryopreservation influence on boar and bull spermatozoa was not significantly produced by pre-freezing procedures, but rather by freezing and thawing. Cryopreservation has more pronounced negative effects on boar than on bull spermatozoa, which partly explains lagged commercialization of frozen boar semen.
Key concepts: BOAR, Semen, Cryopreservation, Andrology, Sperm, Bull semen, Staining, Biology