2019Unpublished venueRequires access

Encrypted Dataset Collaboration

Isaac Potoczny-Jones, Erin Kenneally, John Ruffing

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

The past year has seen increasing scrutiny of Smart Cities efforts with regard to privacy. Privacy advocates have criticized Smart City data collection on the whole and critiqued specific city efforts that they feel have crossed a line.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The past year has seen increasing scrutiny of Smart Cities efforts with regard to privacy. Privacy advocates have criticized Smart City data collection on the whole and critiqued specific city efforts that they feel have crossed a line.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The past year has seen increasing scrutiny of Smart Cities efforts with regard to privacy. Privacy advocates have criticized Smart City data collection on the whole and critiqued specific city efforts that they feel have crossed a line.

Key concepts: Scrutiny, Encryption, Internet privacy, Computer science, Information privacy, Smart city, Data collection, Computer security

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Encrypted Dataset Collaboration — Research Paper | ScholarLens