Hot Off the Press: Chemical Versus Electrical Cardioversion for Atrial Fibrillation
Christopher Bond, Justin Morgenstern, Corey R. Heitz, William Kenneth Milne
Abstract
Open-access reader
Christopher Bond, Justin Morgenstern, Corey R. Heitz, William Kenneth Milne
Abstract
Open-access reader
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a significant dysrhythmia that often requires treatment in the emergency department (ED). This can be performed with rhythm control using electrical or chemical cardioversion or with rate control. There is widespread variation in management of AF within Canada and worldwide. This study focuses on rhythm control techniques, comparing ED length of stay when using an electrical-first strategy versus a chemical-first strategy of cardioversion.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a significant dysrhythmia that often requires treatment in the emergency department (ED). This can be performed with rhythm control using electrical or chemical cardioversion or with rate control. There is widespread variation in management of AF within Canada and worldwide. This study focuses on rhythm control techniques, comparing ED length of stay when using an electrical-first strategy versus a chemical-first strategy of cardioversion.
Key concepts: Medicine, Electrical cardioversion, Cardioversion, Atrial fibrillation, Cardiology, Emergency department, Internal medicine, Rhythm