2012DergiPark (Istanbul University)Open access

MARKETS AND GOVERNMENT: REALIZING THE PROMISE OF GAINS FROM EXCHANGE AND COOPERATION

William R. Keech, Michael C. Munger, Carl P. Simon

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Recent policy debates have focused on the boundary between markets and government, as if one could partition them. The placement of this boundary has been debated using the established theory of market failure and the developing theory of government failure. But the questions raised by this approach are not well-posed, and miss several important points. First, markets and governments together can achieve and have achieved enormous success in the last two hundred years in broadening geographical settings. Second, markets need government, and government needs markets to enable societies to capture the gains of cooperation and exchange. Third, we challenge the relevance of idealized “competitive equilibrium” as the reference point against which real outcomes are to be compared. As an alternative, we propose that the appropriate benchmark for comparison is Pareto improvement through solving problems of collective action. In that regard, both firms operating in markets and government agencies operating in a statutory setting should be considered together as organizations. Viewed from this perspective, both firms and government agencies have some shared features and some sharply different features in their capacity for fostering cooperation. In this paper we outline the advantages and risks of complex organizations, and provide some general guidelines for public policymaking.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Recent policy debates have focused on the boundary between markets and government, as if one could partition them. The placement of this boundary has been debated using the established theory of market failure and the developing theory of government failure. But the questions raised by this approach are not well-posed, and miss several important points. First, markets and governments together can achieve and have achieved enormous success in the last two hundred years in broadening geographical settings. Second, markets need government, and government needs markets to enable societies to capture the gains of cooperation and exchange. Third, we challenge the relevance of idealized “competitive equilibrium” as the reference point against which real outcomes are to be compared. As an alternative, we propose that the appropriate benchmark for comparison is Pareto improvement through solving problems of collective action. In that regard, both firms operating in markets and government agencies operating in a statutory setting should be considered together as organizations. Viewed from this perspective, both firms and government agencies have some shared features and some sharply different features in their capacity for fostering cooperation. In this paper we outline the advantages and risks of complex organizations, and provide some general guidelines for public policymaking.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Recent policy debates have focused on the boundary between markets and government, as if one could partition them. The placement of this boundary has been debated using the established theory of market failure and the developing theory of government failure. But the questions raised by this approach are not well-posed, and miss several important points. First, markets and governments together can achieve and have achieved enormous success in the last two hundred years in broadening geographical settings. Second, markets need government, and government needs markets to enable societies to capture the gains of cooperation and exchange. Third, we challenge the relevance of idealized “competitive equilibrium” as the reference point against which real outcomes are to be compared. As an alternative, we propose that the appropriate benchmark for comparison is Pareto improvement through solving problems of collective action. In that regard, both firms operating in markets and government agencies operating in a statutory setting should be considered together as organizations. Viewed from this perspective, both firms and government agencies have some shared features and some sharply different features in their capacity for fostering cooperation. In this paper we outline the advantages and risks of complex organizations, and provide some general guidelines for public policymaking.

Key concepts: Government (linguistics), Business, Industrial organization, International economics, Economics, Linguistics, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
MARKETS AND GOVERNMENT: REALIZING THE PROMISE OF GAINS FROM EXCHANGE AND COOPERATION — Research Paper | ScholarLens