2019•Law in contextOpen access

Law’s Wars, Law’s Trials The Fate of the Rule of Law in the U.S. ‘War on Terror’

Richard Abel

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The rule of law is a foundation of the liberal state. There is broad consensus about its core, extending across the political spectrum. Our own experience tragically teaches that the rule of law is most endangered when those exercising state power feel threatened: during and after wars and in response to social protest.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The rule of law is a foundation of the liberal state. There is broad consensus about its core, extending across the political spectrum. Our own experience tragically teaches that the rule of law is most endangered when those exercising state power feel threatened: during and after wars and in response to social protest.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The rule of law is a foundation of the liberal state. There is broad consensus about its core, extending across the political spectrum. Our own experience tragically teaches that the rule of law is most endangered when those exercising state power feel threatened: during and after wars and in response to social protest.

Key concepts: Law, Rule of law, Political science, State (computer science), Project commissioning, Publishing, Politics, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Law’s Wars, Law’s Trials The Fate of the Rule of Law in the U.S. ‘War on Terror’ — Research Paper | ScholarLens