2019•Unpublished venueRequires access

Being-in-Alien

Adnan Mahmutović, Denise Ask Nunes

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The Alien films (1979, 1986, 1992, 1997) have inspired a substantial body of scholarship in gender studies, which has examined feminine monsters and motherhood. However, with the introduction of the prequels, Prometheus (2012 ) and Alien: Covenant (2017) , interest has shifted from the monster to its creation and the question of “true” origins. This chapter utilizes the phenomenology of Martin Heidegger to show how the Alien prequels characterize humans as defined by a concern with their being ( Dasein ) and a relation to Being ( Sein ). Ridley Scott’s prequels ask the audience to rethink the relationship between beings and Being through the image of bodily interdependence. The drive to create, change, and metamorphose continuously positions the human among abject bodies that help define us, yet in relation to which we ourselves can be perceived as the abject that must be rejected. The Alien itself loses importance as the story of the metamorphosing Alien-man-machine trinity emerges.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Alien films (1979, 1986, 1992, 1997) have inspired a substantial body of scholarship in gender studies, which has examined feminine monsters and motherhood. However, with the introduction of the prequels, Prometheus (2012 ) and Alien: Covenant (2017) , interest has shifted from the monster to its creation and the question of “true” origins. This chapter utilizes the phenomenology of Martin Heidegger to show how the Alien prequels characterize humans as defined by a concern with their being ( Dasein ) and a relation to Being ( Sein ). Ridley Scott’s prequels ask the audience to rethink the relationship between beings and Being through the image of bodily interdependence. The drive to create, change, and metamorphose continuously positions the human among abject bodies that help define us, yet in relation to which we ourselves can be perceived as the abject that must be rejected. The Alien itself loses importance as the story of the metamorphosing Alien-man-machine trinity emerges.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Alien films (1979, 1986, 1992, 1997) have inspired a substantial body of scholarship in gender studies, which has examined feminine monsters and motherhood. However, with the introduction of the prequels, Prometheus (2012 ) and Alien: Covenant (2017) , interest has shifted from the monster to its creation and the question of “true” origins. This chapter utilizes the phenomenology of Martin Heidegger to show how the Alien prequels characterize humans as defined by a concern with their being ( Dasein ) and a relation to Being ( Sein ). Ridley Scott’s prequels ask the audience to rethink the relationship between beings and Being through the image of bodily interdependence. The drive to create, change, and metamorphose continuously positions the human among abject bodies that help define us, yet in relation to which we ourselves can be perceived as the abject that must be rejected. The Alien itself loses importance as the story of the metamorphosing Alien-man-machine trinity emerges.

Key concepts: Alien, Geography, Political science, Law, Citizenship, Politics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Being-in-Alien — Research Paper | ScholarLens