2018•Unpublished venueRequires access

The evil in God

Thomas R. Nevin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Boehme’s claim to private experience of cosmic revelation launched theosophy as a surrogate/displacement of Biblical authority. He drew upon ancient traditions of secret knowledge, Kabbalistic and neo-Platonic, and was successor to individual inquirers such as Sebastian Franck and Paracelsus. Drawing on alchemy for analogues of good and evil, he locates both in God, Lucifer and Jesus being divine brothers. Lucifer, hard, cold, bitter, seeks Jesus, soft, warm, sweet-flowing, for a compound of these opposites. A pseudo-science cobbled from Boehme’s acquaintance with cognoscenti in his parish compensates for the failing orthodoxy it has weakened. My argument draws upon a Lutheran pastor’s lengthy devastation of Boehme’s pretensions as dangerously un-Christian. That attack includes this book’s motif, “Isn’t this a refined, quiet and gradual way of passing from God’s Word to atheism?” I also intuit Nietzsche’s awareness of Boehme’s prophetic dynamic, the conjunction of good and evil, derived from medieval German mysticism. Nietzsche follows what I call Boehme’s metaphysics of suffering, the ontological struggle of self-overcoming, for which the central text is Also sprach Zarathustra .

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Boehme’s claim to private experience of cosmic revelation launched theosophy as a surrogate/displacement of Biblical authority. He drew upon ancient traditions of secret knowledge, Kabbalistic and neo-Platonic, and was successor to individual inquirers such as Sebastian Franck and Paracelsus. Drawing on alchemy for analogues of good and evil, he locates both in God, Lucifer and Jesus being divine brothers. Lucifer, hard, cold, bitter, seeks Jesus, soft, warm, sweet-flowing, for a compound of these opposites. A pseudo-science cobbled from Boehme’s acquaintance with cognoscenti in his parish compensates for the failing orthodoxy it has weakened. My argument draws upon a Lutheran pastor’s lengthy devastation of Boehme’s pretensions as dangerously un-Christian. That attack includes this book’s motif, “Isn’t this a refined, quiet and gradual way of passing from God’s Word to atheism?” I also intuit Nietzsche’s awareness of Boehme’s prophetic dynamic, the conjunction of good and evil, derived from medieval German mysticism. Nietzsche follows what I call Boehme’s metaphysics of suffering, the ontological struggle of self-overcoming, for which the central text is Also sprach Zarathustra .

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Boehme’s claim to private experience of cosmic revelation launched theosophy as a surrogate/displacement of Biblical authority. He drew upon ancient traditions of secret knowledge, Kabbalistic and neo-Platonic, and was successor to individual inquirers such as Sebastian Franck and Paracelsus. Drawing on alchemy for analogues of good and evil, he locates both in God, Lucifer and Jesus being divine brothers. Lucifer, hard, cold, bitter, seeks Jesus, soft, warm, sweet-flowing, for a compound of these opposites. A pseudo-science cobbled from Boehme’s acquaintance with cognoscenti in his parish compensates for the failing orthodoxy it has weakened. My argument draws upon a Lutheran pastor’s lengthy devastation of Boehme’s pretensions as dangerously un-Christian. That attack includes this book’s motif, “Isn’t this a refined, quiet and gradual way of passing from God’s Word to atheism?” I also intuit Nietzsche’s awareness of Boehme’s prophetic dynamic, the conjunction of good and evil, derived from medieval German mysticism. Nietzsche follows what I call Boehme’s metaphysics of suffering, the ontological struggle of self-overcoming, for which the central text is Also sprach Zarathustra .

Key concepts: Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The evil in God — Research Paper | ScholarLens