2019Translational BiophotonicsOpen access

Comparing in vivo and ex vivo fiberoptic diffuse reflectance spectroscopy in colorectal cancer

Elisabeth J. M. Baltussen, Susan G. Brouwer de Koning, Benno H. W. Hendriks, Katarzyna Jóźwiak, Henricus J. C. M. Sterenborg, Theo J. M. Ruers

Open full text 13 citations

Abstract

Abstract In vivo data acquisition using fiberoptic diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) is more complicated and less controlled compared to ex vivo data acquisition. It would be of great benefit if classifiers for in vivo tissue discrimination based on DRS could be trained on data obtained ex vivo. In this study, in vivo and ex vivo DRS measurements are obtained during colorectal cancer surgery. A mixed model statistical analysis is used to examine the differences between the two datasets. Furthermore, classifiers are trained and tested using in vivo and ex vivo data. It is found that with a classifier trained on ex vivo data and tested on in vivo data, similar results are obtained compared to a classifier trained and tested on in vivo data. In conclusion, under the conditions used in this study, classifiers intended for in vivo tissue discrimination can be trained on ex vivo data.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract In vivo data acquisition using fiberoptic diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) is more complicated and less controlled compared to ex vivo data acquisition. It would be of great benefit if classifiers for in vivo tissue discrimination based on DRS could be trained on data obtained ex vivo. In this study, in vivo and ex vivo DRS measurements are obtained during colorectal cancer surgery. A mixed model statistical analysis is used to examine the differences between the two datasets. Furthermore, classifiers are trained and tested using in vivo and ex vivo data. It is found that with a classifier trained on ex vivo data and tested on in vivo data, similar results are obtained compared to a classifier trained and tested on in vivo data. In conclusion, under the conditions used in this study, classifiers intended for in vivo tissue discrimination can be trained on ex vivo data.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract In vivo data acquisition using fiberoptic diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) is more complicated and less controlled compared to ex vivo data acquisition. It would be of great benefit if classifiers for in vivo tissue discrimination based on DRS could be trained on data obtained ex vivo. In this study, in vivo and ex vivo DRS measurements are obtained during colorectal cancer surgery. A mixed model statistical analysis is used to examine the differences between the two datasets. Furthermore, classifiers are trained and tested using in vivo and ex vivo data. It is found that with a classifier trained on ex vivo data and tested on in vivo data, similar results are obtained compared to a classifier trained and tested on in vivo data. In conclusion, under the conditions used in this study, classifiers intended for in vivo tissue discrimination can be trained on ex vivo data.

Key concepts: Ex vivo, In vivo, Biomedical engineering, Medicine, Biology, Biotechnology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparing in vivo and ex vivo fiberoptic diffuse reflectance spectroscopy in colorectal cancer — Research Paper | ScholarLens