2019•Apollo (University of Cambridge)Open access

Brahms, Autodidacticism, and the Curious Case of the Gavotte

Martin Ennis

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

In later decades, Johannes Brahms repeatedly stressed the inadequacy of his musical education, claiming he learned nothing from Eduard Marxsen and Robert Schumann, the two figures usually regarded as his principal mentors. In this article, a tribute to the Brahms scholar Robert Pascall who died in June 2018, I test the reliability of Brahms’s comments, concluding that he enjoyed a thorough training; in fact, Marxsen emerges from the study as a remarkably effective pedagogue. Nonetheless, after leaving Hamburg in 1853 Brahms embarked on an autodidactic program probably without parallel in nineteenth-century Germany. This program, based largely on the exploration of Baroque scores and treatises, was a course of study he would later encourage aspirant composers to replicate. The article views Brahms’s autodidacticism through the lens of meter, with a focus on compositions that reference the gavotte, a particularly pertinent genre given that its metrical layout was often confused. I reveal that Brahms’s practice in compositions related to the gavotte sometimes contradicts advice he offered friends and pupils; it also sits uncomfortably alongside the composer’s response to the rebarrings of musical classics advocated by Hugo Riemann. These various inconsistencies encourage us to look afresh at the agenda that lay behind Brahms’s stance on pedagogy and learning. I argue in conclusion that Brahms used his own musical education as a form of self-justification in ongoing disputes with the New German School.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In later decades, Johannes Brahms repeatedly stressed the inadequacy of his musical education, claiming he learned nothing from Eduard Marxsen and Robert Schumann, the two figures usually regarded as his principal mentors. In this article, a tribute to the Brahms scholar Robert Pascall who died in June 2018, I test the reliability of Brahms’s comments, concluding that he enjoyed a thorough training; in fact, Marxsen emerges from the study as a remarkably effective pedagogue. Nonetheless, after leaving Hamburg in 1853 Brahms embarked on an autodidactic program probably without parallel in nineteenth-century Germany. This program, based largely on the exploration of Baroque scores and treatises, was a course of study he would later encourage aspirant composers to replicate. The article views Brahms’s autodidacticism through the lens of meter, with a focus on compositions that reference the gavotte, a particularly pertinent genre given that its metrical layout was often confused. I reveal that Brahms’s practice in compositions related to the gavotte sometimes contradicts advice he offered friends and pupils; it also sits uncomfortably alongside the composer’s response to the rebarrings of musical classics advocated by Hugo Riemann. These various inconsistencies encourage us to look afresh at the agenda that lay behind Brahms’s stance on pedagogy and learning. I argue in conclusion that Brahms used his own musical education as a form of self-justification in ongoing disputes with the New German School.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In later decades, Johannes Brahms repeatedly stressed the inadequacy of his musical education, claiming he learned nothing from Eduard Marxsen and Robert Schumann, the two figures usually regarded as his principal mentors. In this article, a tribute to the Brahms scholar Robert Pascall who died in June 2018, I test the reliability of Brahms’s comments, concluding that he enjoyed a thorough training; in fact, Marxsen emerges from the study as a remarkably effective pedagogue. Nonetheless, after leaving Hamburg in 1853 Brahms embarked on an autodidactic program probably without parallel in nineteenth-century Germany. This program, based largely on the exploration of Baroque scores and treatises, was a course of study he would later encourage aspirant composers to replicate. The article views Brahms’s autodidacticism through the lens of meter, with a focus on compositions that reference the gavotte, a particularly pertinent genre given that its metrical layout was often confused. I reveal that Brahms’s practice in compositions related to the gavotte sometimes contradicts advice he offered friends and pupils; it also sits uncomfortably alongside the composer’s response to the rebarrings of musical classics advocated by Hugo Riemann. These various inconsistencies encourage us to look afresh at the agenda that lay behind Brahms’s stance on pedagogy and learning. I argue in conclusion that Brahms used his own musical education as a form of self-justification in ongoing disputes with the New German School.

Key concepts: Art

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Brahms, Autodidacticism, and the Curious Case of the Gavotte — Research Paper | ScholarLens