2019•Unpublished venueRequires access

Health system accountability in South Africa

Jessica Rucell

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Violence against women during childbirth and obstetric malpractice are common globally. A central factor in these injustices is gender discrimination, which results in inequalities in power. This is ‘obstetric structural violence’ and there are three key factors that generate and sustain this: social norms, political-economic arrangements , and health systems and their policies . This chapter investigates health system accountability in South Africa, and draws from primary and secondary data on the distribution and functioning of health governance, obstetric malpractice case law, settlements, and a legislative response. The analysis evidences a relationship between obstetric violence, maternal mortality, and neo-natal disability. Further, despite legislated community oversight, power remains concentrated within an institutional hierarchy. The structure of health systems undermines the authority of healthcare professionals and enforces complacency, tolerance, and the normalisation of violence against women. Obstetric-related negligence case law shows that such law suits have little bearing on accountability and have little impact on improvements to the quality of care. Rather, direct acts are invisibilised by the way they feature as evidence in the litigation. Thus, the main conclusion is the functioning of health system accountability mechanisms, legal claims, and several examples of Ministerial leadership encourages the tolerance of direct and structural obstetric violence in several overlapping and reinforcing ways.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Violence against women during childbirth and obstetric malpractice are common globally. A central factor in these injustices is gender discrimination, which results in inequalities in power. This is ‘obstetric structural violence’ and there are three key factors that generate and sustain this: social norms, political-economic arrangements , and health systems and their policies . This chapter investigates health system accountability in South Africa, and draws from primary and secondary data on the distribution and functioning of health governance, obstetric malpractice case law, settlements, and a legislative response. The analysis evidences a relationship between obstetric violence, maternal mortality, and neo-natal disability. Further, despite legislated community oversight, power remains concentrated within an institutional hierarchy. The structure of health systems undermines the authority of healthcare professionals and enforces complacency, tolerance, and the normalisation of violence against women. Obstetric-related negligence case law shows that such law suits have little bearing on accountability and have little impact on improvements to the quality of care. Rather, direct acts are invisibilised by the way they feature as evidence in the litigation. Thus, the main conclusion is the functioning of health system accountability mechanisms, legal claims, and several examples of Ministerial leadership encourages the tolerance of direct and structural obstetric violence in several overlapping and reinforcing ways.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Violence against women during childbirth and obstetric malpractice are common globally. A central factor in these injustices is gender discrimination, which results in inequalities in power. This is ‘obstetric structural violence’ and there are three key factors that generate and sustain this: social norms, political-economic arrangements , and health systems and their policies . This chapter investigates health system accountability in South Africa, and draws from primary and secondary data on the distribution and functioning of health governance, obstetric malpractice case law, settlements, and a legislative response. The analysis evidences a relationship between obstetric violence, maternal mortality, and neo-natal disability. Further, despite legislated community oversight, power remains concentrated within an institutional hierarchy. The structure of health systems undermines the authority of healthcare professionals and enforces complacency, tolerance, and the normalisation of violence against women. Obstetric-related negligence case law shows that such law suits have little bearing on accountability and have little impact on improvements to the quality of care. Rather, direct acts are invisibilised by the way they feature as evidence in the litigation. Thus, the main conclusion is the functioning of health system accountability mechanisms, legal claims, and several examples of Ministerial leadership encourages the tolerance of direct and structural obstetric violence in several overlapping and reinforcing ways.

Key concepts: Accountability, Political science, Geography, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Health system accountability in South Africa — Research Paper | ScholarLens